IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 14 September 2016 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA3812B8F0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.809
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.809 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KKGdKkkejq6r for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E56C12B97C for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id D83ADA2; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:09:42 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1473862182; bh=doi/j8wh6FU3l/U6Gl4ZH9dx0IupVRQczxfU+Nka2sA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cAc1Dc1b/CYTvajFrR4xmUEHqXf7bedadRMGDErY9eD2w7IsstBhm6PqSzaAb1HnO rKdRPsP99zHB4pitOUuQTgB7+R+4yIFEszQm75XLt5UZ+dfc8VzovVqYx/Qsg9fS8X jw1aF1iRL5/LhhdGEJRnR8o144yF7zM7zHGukq/A=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBF8A1; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:09:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:09:42 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmYVgnDeJv-H5vxnkvikJBk_7LKfgqsgNTMeAabQ5OTeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609141604570.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20160908214031.GA23544@pfrc.org> <20160908231840.GB16775@puck.nether.net> <20160909153317.GC8370@pfrc.org> <8C072797-55A7-4D1A-87E4-67551953EF22@puck.nether.net> <20160909155952.GE8370@pfrc.org> <20160909164640.GE79185@Space.Net> <20160909170513.GE12105@pfrc.org> <20160909171110.GF79185@Space.Net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609141250080.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA+b+ERmYVgnDeJv-H5vxnkvikJBk_7LKfgqsgNTMeAabQ5OTeQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/SMOiBxGnFUKCgnnGXE3PICOZWuA>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:46:26 -0000

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Robert Raszuk wrote:

> Get what out of the door ? Are you asking IDR to give you code to run in 
> your network ?

I'm asking IDR to get the document out the door. We can hit the vendors 
over the head for implementations after that just fine, thank you.

And having worked at operators since 1999, I can tell you that getting 
through the account teams is designed to be hard. The answer is always 
"you're the only one asking for this". I've been told this so many times 
(which usually was a lie) it's very upsetting to read your text about 
operators not trying hard enough. What should we have done? All camped 
outside John Chambers office with banners demanding this, or what?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email