Re: Status of this memo

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 27 April 2021 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F023A16E9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 05:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f1WTlwtQh48O for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 05:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF0E3A16E2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 05:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35532FC0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:40:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:40:39 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=bzidJ08i3DVZOHgFLLdyVkjBZ8sCtWS2lT1p5OzCb 2I=; b=Kk8O1teXPNyW1LHzLlh//Dla39qi6894dzNi8+YcNN1sa/HgIf229LIpg ZS01WK0VENQdJuPGxSBYIhL9Idy8IkC2GFYeq4gUTpwm8vXH1KUbyc/9tjN4oVXk +mju0zbPiUnZSeAdi0jdBm/t8PL0japlVmihVS9m58iS5Hg+GwOE2GgWT0tHsBN0 5h04zLUFx3r/AH3H7/PIuNOeXJoUPWd2/WzpQWzSCYZArQ8aWZjreGJR7l6C5QBp mpnXcUFs/4hn1c7EuhJWko54E/hC0FrgNNuSvTNj/kJrMxdJpXqn6R2E6UZ/2deI 94LU+fIj1iTu4dFdpnzKxG8SrgVBQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:RgaIYKn0-Ru5285RPZVVrcbPiNssNwIIRJ3EPIFLcndVeO1kRS_gHg> <xme:RgaIYB0e_9yXaBAz0Qz5mK76ECrWKOQJViB6Pl5TdOIt-n2MmrmFzzyrbOhBUF8GI g6XIi9cYm4BZA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddvtddgheehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeehnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtffegjeejle dvuddtiedtfeeggefhudetgfelveekffeljefhhfejtdduhfekteenucffohhmrghinhep ihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejfedruddufedrudeiledriedunecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhr khdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:RgaIYIo4yi09F68X-0qHCwrlnUaZCbf18yF2t3UsaPblkxHoSLUtfg> <xmx:RgaIYOl6AT4p6eHUxPDap9O8uV2cnqPwUwikqrdPKQRpuimxZjOncg> <xmx:RgaIYI1vHlT9G-VXyeXisW_GnR3KyvCS8A7x5IQk64qSfHdkEvMkew> <xmx:RgaIYD1L7iQIIgEUk5_UGRWrw7oRMNU5jflzR3qRM6IjX5DyRBBdPA>
Received: from [192.168.30.202] (c-73-113-169-61.hsd1.tn.comcast.net [73.113.169.61]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:40:38 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Status of this memo
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <376f83f0-89a3-cd0e-1792-c8434bd8a5d2@gmail.com> <9ACE59FA-30B6-475A-AF6B-4B874E4A2788@eggert.org> <1804294246.5904.1619512137931@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <D653D3B2-7666-409A-B856-2A4B1BA958CA@eggert.org>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <620f38e4-94f7-2b8c-54f0-1895ce2dded2@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:40:37 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D653D3B2-7666-409A-B856-2A4B1BA958CA@eggert.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-0KGFLWKcRsoNE0Q5zmHwe1EybU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:40:46 -0000

On 4/27/21 4:41 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:

> There was a suggestion recently to not serve I-Ds from ietf.org domains until they were adopted by the IETF. Do you think serving individual drafts from another domain would help make that distinction clearer?

The very notion of "adoption" of a draft by the IETF (or at least by a 
working group) is a Bad Idea, as it tends to indicate an assumed 
direction for the WG that isn't yet reflected by a deep understanding of 
the draft or its implications, and makes it harder for a WG to change 
direction.     WGs should be able to entertain alternate proposals at 
any time prior to a post-WGLC consensus, without any built-in 
presumption that some particular draft will be the basis for the 
eventual solution.

So no, please don't do this.

Keith