IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Status of this memo [NOTE WELL]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 27 April 2021 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C9E3A24C2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lICxbYjbxeJX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAAF03A2852 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id s15so3326577plg.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sxXSduP0XgjTx6WaJgcSyluIjIpROhNQKpZt3fi1qy8=; b=awKMbqfzMzlVt4bgcMYDecRs6cLIvAOlrTw8wSpVFmtc5goAmN+qxEVHOAeePWJx61 mPl0aEGYM69p+d3v7y9b8Gt/N3LjBvwmWSc1jyLwLWgX2BXV7lqZDYtHC4vLsOwPNmc2 erTdT21lhb9d9Jdjcyp/WXHbC2QN5j/yY3eAIPiYnQqNNKpgRYCEefb/K4LuyrfaGG3e Z8XWn01bjKcnh4ueySuzhWaRFpEpZLGiA+hoLRauffPcmI9hzcUPIPyWZQOReAVoyeJT vp9YHz7fa10yRxH2k16mwO2I9q2vrLyISDq7vGVPg+V53O3VcLCD1cTI8IBkzoizmm99 y80A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sxXSduP0XgjTx6WaJgcSyluIjIpROhNQKpZt3fi1qy8=; b=cwUq8EinHy5vuQCK6oECUYXszufHOUd6l+VCqLEpJ7LM2xeSSTcOkEloP78v1vhVtu K2TyvTUvYsCPbdrhVPGyWI4i9q3Kxkt9AHcKZYYIOA0Er+zlieMTH3alIaMLMYS98Kvt FZQ+jPpDVTNqxyPQd2CAWwGI6O0Z0cA6RCc9Q85YCWIH28eXc5wiEAxv3FTtC2hJjZPE l8C61cwDz0aOLyRx6tUi9sdy8wU3bgEru0pyxsw2xkV8w6Q+rboForjC+N0KuDuG8Awh ki5Vyps0FgaJZMS3NxaEsiuuD7PTcFGhrbcs+qPTGLPSfSac/dMUuGVS6+aHF6gUSwte ERxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531En1swQwFgsb9OJQHVSy2fik7DauSxuwjRlnTHsuVsNhJGc9Py LLNHGmceVXTLuN+jfnHOJIB4NOEjDjpRww==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3RdOawgy50PnuoWAyX/KP+EcXZ+lw2O/qykyfT0aKcEI71FrAFD+Zec5MOzfbjzp9pjqgMQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7e4d:b029:ed:6580:7edd with SMTP id a13-20020a1709027e4db02900ed65807eddmr3266182pln.46.1619565213468; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.176] (sc-cs-567-laptop.uoa.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.38.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm3419927pfl.159.2021.04.27.16.13.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Status of this memo [NOTE WELL]
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <376f83f0-89a3-cd0e-1792-c8434bd8a5d2@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhZp4iFkr49VFfuqWJTw1oWiTvmJnUUsL-PjwMZUdK2uA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c5e64540-522f-6147-1e89-08adf054ac99@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:13:30 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhZp4iFkr49VFfuqWJTw1oWiTvmJnUUsL-PjwMZUdK2uA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lB3XzA1B__Epynxsy512Ymxanhg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 23:14:49 -0000

On 28-Apr-21 01:33, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
...

> Internet-Drafts are documents submitted according to the 'NOTE WELL'

The NOTE WELL is not binding; it's the actual BCPs that control intellectual property rules and they are of course directly cited in the boilerplate.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email