IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Status of this memo

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 27 April 2021 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769F73A1893 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LqRMsDLHrpv7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01183A1891 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:c5c0:d78c:9157:c015]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFE6F60031D; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:19:03 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1619529543; bh=6Cxn8wMo3w/fs8i8E75EdygZYYBKbspmRxkgQSwmWsI=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=0JGv9h8WcB0HA7FWAINtCgaa0rNWsavcvqG2EKTNpD9vr3L7lT7/GMgyhzynxgo5y cPXErjml0hVdASsTMH5VcPUCehxjnb4uByHQviMQaabap3wNXgKMaILl8P+PYOQ2yC gkfIL/E1Wiez87oRIqC8yglWxbAJdb3PA2BqqkHw=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <380023FD-19E3-410D-AB13-A5E1DB44F173@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B7B6D5A5-3BEC-420F-8CD0-95DA1551EC12"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Subject: Re: Status of this memo
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:19:03 +0300
In-Reply-To: <e6892fbe-5294-9490-36a9-7bc5d8ca04f5@network-heretics.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
References: <376f83f0-89a3-cd0e-1792-c8434bd8a5d2@gmail.com> <9ACE59FA-30B6-475A-AF6B-4B874E4A2788@eggert.org> <1804294246.5904.1619512137931@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <D653D3B2-7666-409A-B856-2A4B1BA958CA@eggert.org> <620f38e4-94f7-2b8c-54f0-1895ce2dded2@network-heretics.com> <1B2562DF-A451-4FFE-BDFD-84BB31CC96DD@eggert.org> <e6892fbe-5294-9490-36a9-7bc5d8ca04f5@network-heretics.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
X-MailScanner-ID: AFE6F60031D.A46EC
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GYoyDzzjtEQazEa-zyZ6wHU-ZHg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:19:17 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-4-27, at 16:13, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
> I've seen too many groups decide to "adopt" a draft, with little discussion, based only on the appearance of support for the draft by the chairs, when it was clear that most participants (even those in favor of adoption) hadn't even read it.

would you please provide some examples?

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email