IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Status of this memo

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 27 April 2021 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C457E3A1C8E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMZZcq4sUfEu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 570CB3A1C8C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A93162A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:12:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:12:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=TMQ9qK 3sV/DoYFLahnaXnex2c1oCAzQvQ5+FX8d5/UQ=; b=CPlVG9kEW/fyyvT+I4ovNS if/f3mbmyWPVeHijJj5qyJZ6L0Fi51l3+I/cn1L6Mt2orLLWklklp7+TCVhF791B 9V9TXu0riKskEbPJ0l5LPv7Fa7UDKX6gddwJeT8CWVuaG+ioEdcZeim5AyOVkoXD IWr/kqCDTC3QYX7zQLVS+DPbLgT/YC/4zQD1aYbcoib6CnG8045l09tattk95XAT 04vaTvIMdcIIX7p314tBcUD8b5289EdDivB6NvoE9l0cAsfNzF09fdcHPmZn/WZo dud2Rce5CLQeFbs0u0idwLrDr8SBLadMz0ANajihTrgR6PQ5rQpk5VfLs8zGLUYQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:MmKIYNCBejXIR6XC_CKKpqoRQUr1uTQSPO8e4i5SpteEvwD2NqFAgw> <xme:MmKIYLhBgCmDwb93IWCSuEi19xFW_FHMba6VBhSCbjgsCM66svuexdzYqPSpZ8jxW 4l5lRY37alZug>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddvtddgudefiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtd erredtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevfeetudeige dtledvvddtudefjeejffdvfeetjeeiueelgfdtgfegtdffkeetudenucfkphepjeefrddu udefrdduieelrdeiudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:MmKIYImjpwPb5upTCEwm9o6VroYuQ8DwfSP0edOh1KgecpwU4SdAXQ> <xmx:MmKIYHwjfQDHQF6RkbqM3DmJ2Xc5sJ1d2yGUFRaKNlCyHApRR9DGvw> <xmx:MmKIYCRIvR075tljLWvcQ6Pur9diAkmMzEdfHLsrOGC9W4RB1ybXAg> <xmx:M2KIYAAK90ARBWHVyuCDhnuSCJIq5kOdkr2gqvavKVUdlKbzJSX2wg>
Received: from [192.168.30.202] (c-73-113-169-61.hsd1.tn.comcast.net [73.113.169.61]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:12:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Status of this memo
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <376f83f0-89a3-cd0e-1792-c8434bd8a5d2@gmail.com> <9ACE59FA-30B6-475A-AF6B-4B874E4A2788@eggert.org> <1804294246.5904.1619512137931@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <D653D3B2-7666-409A-B856-2A4B1BA958CA@eggert.org> <620f38e4-94f7-2b8c-54f0-1895ce2dded2@network-heretics.com> <7B3AEB02-FAC0-4A70-A85D-E22D1BFC0FC8@tzi.org> <c474c37f-fc0e-0a94-ad4f-5cbe13fe3ac8@network-heretics.com> <CAF4+nEH1-H31b-54sjoWjh427rO4BqF+hkgtYA1SFECYHq5UJw@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR13MB2582E69564667E23B700F138F4419@BYAPR13MB2582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <AED2B9F5-EC49-46D1-822C-FDF5AC3AEA74@tzi.org>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <e1c40c9b-d680-522f-f80c-5da992731bf9@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:12:49 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AED2B9F5-EC49-46D1-822C-FDF5AC3AEA74@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------265B897B33A2423EBD803F9C"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Xz7EQyfegDYWjjm8gNvVKjjusN0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:12:58 -0000

On 4/27/21 3:06 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:

>> We might want to try to make this more consistent across wg's including perhaps redefining "adoption”.
> I hope not.
>
> WGs are different.

Different WGs are (and need to be) different, but it's confusing if 
"adoption" means very different things from one WG to another.

I have generally interpreted "adoption" as meaning "the WG wants to use 
this document as a basis for (some of) its work".   It's not (and 
shouldn't be) a consensus call on the document itself, that's what WGLC 
is for.   It's not exactly an assertion of WG "control" over the 
document, though everyone should understand that drafts intended to be 
WG drafts need to permit creation of derivative works (i.e. forking).  
Nor should it be taken as a commitment on the part of the WG to try to 
publish that document or earn a particular status for it.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email