Re: Status of this memo
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 28 April 2021 19:40 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36CF3A1D96 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOWfrD88FMCj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C1633A1D92 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z23so27101579lji.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oHG6NV7Q5M5ifL7JlD178SR6ykZ9cHlaJW3KgxQYlEI=; b=Wdfe7KXdru8WpqBw7LseZB4UKpo1RYQ6qTxRwo3NYAkL4CFdYZVa6uuYbgFp96jV7g UOomxJskfYkDjCan4pAQuTyPU+EUnto05TXiBoStes6KJf4I4NYFBBh2LZEDGEsxaQu8 l1IM+FWNMbQULHOO7G2duuqIK+xUe8+dDM0CGYdaduAwhPSbZJaegtb9CKkWc0BbVuYx frky7lSmTNv98c1TiYLAsBIGp5zcsn8xWElZT4laLZROMx8psjKkImqX40US/U2io16S i7QF6DKzb4hkLVdaU3CBFtgxTfgPZwCbvMmTCfyBGPmhA2jmXQW87/75RuXwntM+uMxE zp1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oHG6NV7Q5M5ifL7JlD178SR6ykZ9cHlaJW3KgxQYlEI=; b=sjCmAvRToTtOP3f78qXUt0Hk3LhQo+s5+mJGabzxzP9aqtfWde3X5rFFmLU1/IgEvd MNofvoZQOJrRlC7NXn5U2hEIGi3NkyVKA1mOGeuKgpYSlV3YQ3X5ccPVaxvkfx8blL10 O+e/ak9pj8h7b53XHU24XFfFBgQNsR5b3y77/VhBss9nGvgMg0MDUUcNNH5msNLXfLr+ 9hnApWmEF2R0QKS7pFUr9Yit0YHT1VzxGuJ+bWE9d4UHW9OAx2eSulbjwnamfIDC4GW4 /JUQJhX4AwtGGHo99NEs6E89UUpdTBIa3Nt1siDsOLpHfIfy5AvkPyYdd3ipvfj3IpXQ v70Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Xa1n1GQ0nNWC46rN/7RyrsKJ0OEI4Cyuf+wohrGaRZb25cIcc NXRQpR6TSewf/Jex4zXxIg3GPjjmW/IvBKiKQQbGEg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxY3G0pLFpYPSKyUCTvYL3QYSPh2uAzmacn5s3Ix4o/R3F+eQ+fHm4iRNol3zdtuMf71s3tkKjrNVJyxs6z5bg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:90d:: with SMTP id 13mr22047307ljj.280.1619638838653; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2ed3cd27-8896-9cd1-a0ff-99cee3162d49@network-heretics.com> <1970624B-5F7E-483E-A815-BA19046A0E96@yahoo.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1970624B-5F7E-483E-A815-BA19046A0E96@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:40:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKLVz9Sxyfc70-XBhZt6CgXs2r+LvwmiCE2wwp7JyO9gg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of this memo
To: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, IETF Discuss <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a48a4505c10d8dc6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LaxaCRNO3RxZTlmLRnboFOc7M1E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:40:47 -0000
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 5:58 AM Lloyd W <lloyd.wood= 40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > On 28 Apr 2021, at 19:33, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote: > > > On 4/28/21 1:32 AM, Lloyd W wrote: > > I think you've just described TERM, where the charter and > > its document editor are already being micromanaged. > > > Well, TERM isn't a WG (yet), and its creation is AFAIK still in doubt, and > now is the appropriate time to debate the charter and the wisdom of > creating the group at all. > > > TERM is now of the seventh revision of its WG charter. Do comment before > it reaches its eighth. > > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/7v2o3SVpq-5A4spPC_s9RYrLmVc/ > > (What's the record for number of charter revisions?) > Well, IOTOPS had 18, but ~14 of those were simply fighting with a (now fixed) bug that rendered lists in a funny format... W > > Lloyd Wood > lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk > -- The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the complexities of his own making. -- E. W. Dijkstra
- Status of this memo Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Lars Eggert
- Re: Status of this memo Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Status of this memo Lars Eggert
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Carsten Bormann
- Re: Status of this memo Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Carsten Bormann
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Lars Eggert
- Re: Status of this memo Lloyd W
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Lars Eggert
- Re: Status of this memo Scott Brim
- Re: Status of this memo Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Scott Bradner
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: Status of this memo Salz, Rich
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Martin Vigoureux
- Re: Status of this memo Carsten Bormann
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Bob Hinden
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- RE: Status of this memo Michael McBride
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Carsten Bormann
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo Donald Eastlake
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo Martin Vigoureux
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo Michael StJohns
- Re: Status of this memo Martin Vigoureux
- Re: Status of this memo Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Status of this memo Randy Presuhn
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo ned+ietf
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo [NOTE WELL] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo [WG consensus] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo [name remixing] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo Scott Bradner
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo [name remixing] Christian Huitema
- Re: Status of this memo Michael StJohns
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo ned+ietf
- Re: Status of this memo Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Status of this memo [NOTE WELL] Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of this memo [WG consensus] Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Status of this memo Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo Lloyd W
- Re: Status of this memo John C Klensin
- Re: Status of this memo Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Status of this memo Simon Josefsson
- Re: Status of this memo Lloyd W
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Keith Moore
- Re: Status of this memo Salz, Rich
- RE: Status of this memo Gorman, Pierce
- Re: Status of this memo Nick Hilliard
- Re: Status of this memo tom petch
- Re: Status of this memo Warren Kumari
- Re: Status of this memo Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of this memo S Moonesamy