Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 21 October 2021 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997093A0B17 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-7zY-opnii0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C868D3A0B0F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HZznz3kDtz6GFN4; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1634848695; bh=MigCn8G4dT72sI9RsvgJtadcYWmpSZPE040CeoWDPWU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=YpZi9+iwm1ueQmT7uXfE/BOdSG0mopspAiu+HgISvrRalKyH+YTf935j6+j6JvwgO 31S3xZQihuk3h/8yq0+55SCK6cgO42ne1jvro/hI6dllkEPycUDE+PzezYJfyMoV/6 R0Vg8199tGYB/gWxvVZTs6fRteHU+xvAA1YYnE+Q=
X-Quarantine-ID: <VGut6FORCehb>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.22.111] (50-233-136-230-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HZznz07dVz6GBf3; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e45ddbda-f7e8-5c3d-8a3f-83d2eab0e714@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:38:12 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
Content-Language: en-US
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba=40computer.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <4BDF1DD9-9D30-499F-8C26-1E7790F2A729@akamai.com> <CALaySJKYG8ydGrgdSKZY1b28VL2DvwTS_3_40y_eFkHcGjdJXg@mail.gmail.com> <53A1649E-0E10-449D-9EC0-87A6FDCD07B2@gmail.com> <11EDEA4E-4301-4CB3-9529-6E4DF368789C@akamai.com> <67d01e27-8a1b-0ad8-afe0-4e9d4d8bb4d1@comcast.net> <F69E3F89-C44D-4692-8115-3B73477EEF54@akamai.com> <CAC4RtVDZ2tXmstcC1oh5NZ8u_FZ-WAVwH-M7nvh_inWTLnkbMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDZ2tXmstcC1oh5NZ8u_FZ-WAVwH-M7nvh_inWTLnkbMg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0_X7SEaalE2Q3qQO8l1XDVRAmGk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:38:21 -0000

That seems a good starting point for discussion.

Thank you Barry.
Joel

On 10/21/2021 4:14 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> I don't think anyone said "must not"... just that we need to allow the
> possibility of no gap.
> 
> So here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-term-limit-guidance/
> 
> I have made an alternative proposal, and I'd appreciate comments on
> that.  I think we can discuss both proposals together.
> 
> Barry
> 
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 2:34 PM Salz, Rich
> <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> With Mike's corrections and cutting off the limit at pre-1996 because the structure changed, we get:
>>
>> Lars was Transport AD until 2011; 10 years.
>> Aliisa was ART AD until 2017, no gap.
>> Jari was Internet AD until 2012; one year.
>> Russ was Security AD until 2007; no gap
>> Brian Carpenter wasn't an AD unless it was before 1989 so at least a 15 year gap.
>> Harald was Ops AD until 1999 so two year gap.
>> Fred Baker wasn't an AD before 1989 so at least a six year gap.
>>
>> Or, 10 0 1 0 infinite 2 inifinite ?
>>
>> I don't see how you can make a compelling argument that AD->IETF Chair must not have a gap year.
>>
>>
>