Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Wed, 20 October 2021 22:23 UTC
Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E183A08D7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmk-yAKXydpQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A723A08D9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.115]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id dIX1m3hwgjtOrdJz4mBScT; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:22:54 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1634768574; bh=8KHjiIx9lI9IaMG6hv8Od2HucdFUUBjAlVTv5BHNMMU=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From: Content-Type; b=jRES9Zv9CBnWRjQGw99iiBfME8eE7iGNdAt8DNapxlYf/NDsIiz6nxqQu29VgEkLu O9HS9FnW4t/lqt7c6JdJDeUD8TzKr0lJTHG/TmvFq+sivM+ZhwueYH3rNUBKn5ul8w Lv9FYHYtG/n786Wvjc1t6qc3/2f94kxQvjm9nLdPelzpKhHnJojgQ6orLOiWyCY4VG Nh3BhcmO/dmVHRtzXfPsHp35cbTUcES1klcP/PWSKS5iN1eD6SoDgvjweHNBVg2r61 9ADj4DsS4YROqqbCOBvS2NIALvsrHNS0v51FgYATxdI2UngorpsjWzpq1T+YhIj1+W yd6E70sJv/Q4Q==
Received: from [192.168.1.23] ([108.51.200.187]) by resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id dJymmhNHlfz4kdJyxm22MC; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:22:52 +0000
X-Xfinity-VAAS: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddvhedgtdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuvehomhgtrghsthdqtfgvshhipdfqfgfvpdfpqffurfetoffkrfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfuthflohhhnhhsuceomhhsthhjohhhnhhssegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiveffgeehhfduheegfeekffffueejteffvdefuddtjeekhffgfeefgeegleehleenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedutdekrdehuddrvddttddrudekjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddrvdefngdpihhnvghtpedutdekrdehuddrvddttddrudekjedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmshhtjhhohhhnshestghomhgtrghsthdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehivghtfhesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit
Message-ID: <67d01e27-8a1b-0ad8-afe0-4e9d4d8bb4d1@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 18:22:37 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <4BDF1DD9-9D30-499F-8C26-1E7790F2A729@akamai.com> <CALaySJKYG8ydGrgdSKZY1b28VL2DvwTS_3_40y_eFkHcGjdJXg@mail.gmail.com> <53A1649E-0E10-449D-9EC0-87A6FDCD07B2@gmail.com> <11EDEA4E-4301-4CB3-9529-6E4DF368789C@akamai.com>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <11EDEA4E-4301-4CB3-9529-6E4DF368789C@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gRSP_rAjvQVPi2fzqFTOwMv5zi8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:23:04 -0000
On 10/20/2021 5:25 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > Gendispatch to BCC; using the general IETF@ list for this discussion. > >> The IETF Chair is different, I agree it’s good to have a person who has served recently as an AD. > Let's see. Looking at https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/past-members/ That page appears to only list the folks that were members when the meeting started, not when it ended. > > Lars was Transport AD until 2011; 10 years. > Aliisa was General AD until 2020, no gap. Applications and Real time until 2017. No gap. > Jari was Internet AD until 2012; one year. > Russ was Security AD until 2007; no gap > Brian Carpenter wasn't an AD unless it was before 1989 so at least a 15 year gap. > Harald was Ops AD until 1998 so three year gap. Harald served until March of 99, so a two year gap. > Fred Baker wasn't an AD before 1989 so at least a six year gap. > Paul Mockapetris wasn't an AD before 1989 so at least a six year gap. > Phillip Gross wasn't an AD unless before 1989 While Phill proposed creation of the IESG and its areas A/O the 14th IETF, they weren't really active as such until the Hawaii (15th) IETF and there was less directive authority from the ADs to their WGs than is currently the case. I would not compare those periods . Phill was listed as the interim/permanent director of the Ops dir until the coup resulting in the first Nomcom selected ADs being appointed in March '93 - that was doable back then. So for Fred, it's more like a 2 year gap. For Paul, a zero year gap. > Michael Corrigan was an AD unless before 1989 > > Did I make any mistakes (quite likely!) in the above? > > Not that my proposal doesn't say "can't be an AD" It just says that if you serve the commonplace two terms, then there must be gap year. >
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Lars Eggert
- Agenda item request Salz, Rich
- Re: Agenda item request John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Michael StJohns
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Carsten Bormann
- draft-leiba-term-limit-guidance-00 [was: draft-rs… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Scott O. Bradner