Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 21 October 2021 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E34B3A0654 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dM_w-6zETC4E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20A33A0900 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a10c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.161.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Hb0RZ74Tcz30Kj; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:07:22 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKrZBXG-QZxUSSpLLA4zqwobLvFXL3aAoJWhLTMQtnthg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:07:22 +0200
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 656543242.6002899-ae9847ceb5fe9621182fea5e33e159a1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7389B808-E528-4854-AA33-1E9E13690866@tzi.org>
References: <4BDF1DD9-9D30-499F-8C26-1E7790F2A729@akamai.com> <CALaySJKYG8ydGrgdSKZY1b28VL2DvwTS_3_40y_eFkHcGjdJXg@mail.gmail.com> <53A1649E-0E10-449D-9EC0-87A6FDCD07B2@gmail.com> <11EDEA4E-4301-4CB3-9529-6E4DF368789C@akamai.com> <67d01e27-8a1b-0ad8-afe0-4e9d4d8bb4d1@comcast.net> <F69E3F89-C44D-4692-8115-3B73477EEF54@akamai.com> <CAC4RtVDZ2tXmstcC1oh5NZ8u_FZ-WAVwH-M7nvh_inWTLnkbMg@mail.gmail.com> <AC161376-4D0D-4B6B-90FB-A57C14C3E2E4@akamai.com> <CALaySJKrZBXG-QZxUSSpLLA4zqwobLvFXL3aAoJWhLTMQtnthg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba=40computer.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Ge3fEHtcT8KqRZ5PU_-I3BTA-Ng>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:07:31 -0000

On 2021-10-21, at 22:43, Barry Leiba <barryleiba=40computer.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> At the very least, we should be able to slow down the "ADs move to the
> IAB" routine, as it's pretty hard to justify that deviation.

Hmm, I’m not even sure I find that particular maneuver to be such a big problem.
Clearly, the implicit incumbent bonus needs to be controlled here (and there should not be a standard revolving door), but I’ve seen some ex-ADs make great IAB members.  I think.

Grüße, Carsten