Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 24 October 2021 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC713A0B3E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGO7jxV_VYkm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E683A0B1A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F685C09C7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:11:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:11:05 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=GewSSYbDk/5mRM1KD7yaPon+oYbseEzy4SYIg0ewI Kk=; b=Snu9ISd+/YyfepuDJ6F9XBp3Kw22pwlaanYwWB4E3xazEpNQYX5BE2ls6 xZ5LPX4efA5DHS371GvgndgcQ0nkFfMRyvLoP61RP1ljBy8078Fw1ZktxxSl0zMl 6NyyXN6wiBiUZuRfSq46LNoJzgDtbngsDmdkY9iMxdCXJ2KzrZkuGf3NymXsppWn zeWRH4uJJPfcGzK+TobOfci6l7Vz8k5yfvTFlMSojsI5EzsNAR/t4Dr5cXGuN+fw yk19pY7SGhmHt+/swM0jtDZahHRCcUEGsalHu254uz7Ct7clNJDA5BIi0ngMaNys tDUWM4v9aJu1rSc1aYRVfiiNDPvMA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:6ct1YaVIJBqjCE471ID3FaNeRt8ITlhhmnMHU2wohJE8ZifyxdtwVg> <xme:6ct1YWlIyRA2ulKFc09HbupGCywjFGEWaKt6vVldZpM7Bcq5kQma-WkxxGDZa8d4C nybHLQA0H-F8A>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:6ct1YeaC7sJyFWdqwfgJCPe9tJorjQ26Kfc3Sg3QaHJH-sCCYjmggplkwE_iz6RPY_r0ETkgk7sAvH0NVgheP3O8B5o1Rf6IT6IG37wM7g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdeffedgudefudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesth ekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephefhuedthe efgfefgffhkeehgfeugfeiudeugeejkeefleelueeiffetfeeuudeunecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifoh hrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:6ct1YRXME65dZRQEKMU0atHh-fcpgyb5pOhMLWJCYpUURqqvgKXqkg> <xmx:6ct1YUmHaH3ANv22EOZL-u_nzNeXoASDbiiYdTHwxhWCvNcm0ZArNw> <xmx:6ct1YWfMP9Xs0ZVmdFuq8JJn2R0v9i8tiiJyIcf23LFw_vov-u4HWg> <xmx:6ct1YQxD9W6LWfcdbnWpONa1FHE77ZppTW27eXHc4lo-DXqO7g-Seg>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:11:05 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <394BBA1E-FA83-4E80-A143-BE3F0764DCDA@tzi.org> <F2D8B2B0-1005-424F-9984-3AC6F951E02F@eggert.org> <CDD17BF9-BBF6-413F-80A6-2928995807C1@akamai.com> <4506E7DA9EF80C64C6AE9432@PSB> <C3ECF081-E47E-4E2B-B17F-F5D39111B114@akamai.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <8f1bdc22-da66-6375-4050-136e4f3b80e5@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:11:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C3ECF081-E47E-4E2B-B17F-F5D39111B114@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WLugUNLy8B-bHIJZAe5rS1Us9u0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 21:11:14 -0000

On 10/23/21 11:52 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:

> My proposal takes the hard decision-making out of Nomcom's hands, and puts it into the IETF community.

That kind of sounds like writing an RFC for how to drive between 
Washington, DC and Manhattan, including where and when to brake or 
steer.   Good luck!

Keith