Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU> Wed, 09 July 2008 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D52D28C13F; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC2928C13F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.962
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.962 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.637, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bgYpzc9xDhFE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE13F28C117 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m69DRnUa026261 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m69DRmnl026256; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:27:48 -0700
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
To: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Message-ID: <20080709132748.GA9572@boreas.isi.edu>
References: <20080707211347.GB2222@zod.isi.edu> <200807080018.m680IPi1016117@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20080708013242.GB10677@zod.isi.edu> <4872DEC5.9040707@network-heretics.com> <20080708172708.GC2519@zod.isi.edu> <4873AF55.8060803@network-heretics.com> <20080708204142.GB92049@zod.isi.edu> <4873D807.7030701@network-heretics.com> <20080708213459.GD92049@zod.isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080708213459.GD92049@zod.isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: bmanning@boreas.isi.edu
Cc: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:34:59PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:11:35PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> > And vanity TLDs are going to be much more attractive if people think 
> > they can get single-label host names out of them.
> 
> Of your concerns (which I don't have the relevant experience to comment
> on in detail), this seems to be fairly small and speculative to me.
> 
> Time will tell.
> 
> -- 
> Ted Faber
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
> Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG


it is possible to have a host name also be a domain name.
myself, i look forward to sending email to

	<ted@v>


-- 
--bill

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf