Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Mon, 07 July 2008 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B823A69D3; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C293A69D3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_SEX=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lesf2ZxFczjK for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m1.imap-partners.net (m1.imap-partners.net [64.13.152.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2623A69CF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lust.indecency.org (adsl-150-225-108.tys.bellsouth.net [72.150.225.108]) by m1.imap-partners.net (MOS 3.8.4-GA) with ESMTP id AWH32707 (AUTH admin@network-heretics.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48725182.7030607@network-heretics.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:25:22 -0400
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
References: <20080707171926.28210.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080707171926.28210.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

> The latest CAIDA study says:
> 
> * The overall query traffic experienced by the roots continues to
>   grow. The observed 2007 query rate and client rate was 1.5-3X above
>   their observed values in 2006
> 
> * The proportion of invalid traffic, i.e., DNS pollution, hitting the
>   roots is still high, over 99% of the queries should not even be sent
>   to the root servers. We found an extremely strong correlation both
>   years: the higher the query rate of a client, the lower the fraction
>   of valid queries.
> 
> That suggests that if the legit traffic increased by an order of
> magnitude, it would still be down in the noise compared to the junk.
> Conversely, if root server traffic is an issue, getting networks to
> clean up their DNS traffic would be much more effective than limiting
> the number of TLDs.

sounds good.  and why wouldn't "cleaning up DNS traffic" include 
refusing to refer any single-label query (for any record type other than 
NS, say) to an upstream server?

Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf