IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Want to be on the IESG?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 07 October 2021 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6954B3A0BC7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 09:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id paX-rDv6jJH1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 09:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B3D43A0B62 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 09:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a8ac.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HQGgT2s54z2xms; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 18:17:25 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Subject: Re: Want to be on the IESG?
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <BA76D727-D0C8-4EF9-B419-E6811A86759E@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 18:17:22 +0200
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 655316241.989408-594b9cee57025b733b74a3d441ab3c30
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <249C4257-5C9F-4864-A581-F1B6ACEB7DF1@tzi.org>
References: <2A8C8B98-CBA9-4BF0-82C5-594B0F309F07@akamai.com> <FA5A7C084BDEF72CE3FC510B@PSB> <CAF4+nEG1-isV2aKgrtFE=Yv2RNyv-XP=ysN3ZeE-H8bNTykx7g@mail.gmail.com> <9A7FD2DE22C1D2ED1AB9E21D@PSB> <6D74EDE3-0F73-4C97-B9CC-65624BF95FF9@akamai.com> <CAKKJt-fv9NAK-XGwWYBSn1dU8KNn-mHc0i-9MNNXTwPG88itFg@mail.gmail.com> <21674.1633366197@localhost> <C0C0679B-D9B0-474B-879C-9F8D7020E80A@akamai.com> <46743679-3566-d383-10c6-22a05d78deb3@cs.tcd.ie> <BA76D727-D0C8-4EF9-B419-E6811A86759E@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/830GgqEWxZZFbSBcVgbt58lSIwg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 16:17:38 -0000

On 2021-10-07, at 16:51, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I would say no person can serve in a nomcom-chosen position for more than four years in a row; there must be at least a one-year gap.  No exemptions.

I don’t think we can afford discarding all these potential Human Resources, if only for a year.

Instead, the spirit of this could be developed as IETF consensus and communicated to the noncom.  They would still know when to stick with that simplistic rule and when it doesn’t work.  Do the right thing.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email