Re: Want to be on the IESG?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sun, 03 October 2021 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B7B3A0938 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 06:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SxyPQ_C0s5Yu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 06:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589003A0937 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 06:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 193C9njQ008614; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 14:20:23 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=do7i+tbYNc19Qco5mgtzNhz29YXybUF9Oew9mxTmEgc=; b=j7jXXPRXcfYeWZVLrYRUfsGLPeaQF/5as+5PH8WsEVTLfPV1ycdkygR5OFBSdpydvpym ie4SRkIp5IRT877cP2Q1EiKB5ZvfsPPh4WOtUgU5w0EHIPDpu2+vJbCPg8SC212C5Kbn kcsEv2jR5KbcxCjWjXMTB6lnitugRX3ho279hXRYNPUJTdAMSqnzIitQsNdF34HadVO0 TJl1C10vCgipjMArvoGxbGkwDECSa68++xUssK2ZQsIBk+8K60K96llDmnMa2Z4A11oj miIVc80DmI17tE+iMhLqI9tKJEu0Y6lgfeag7HVJdlfd/+4oMCimpr8GufU8vxa12zno Gw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 3bf31vw828-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:20:23 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 193DJl60017983; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:20:21 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3bejryhx6e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 03 Oct 2021 09:20:21 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:20:21 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.023; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:20:21 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Want to be on the IESG?
Thread-Topic: Want to be on the IESG?
Thread-Index: AQHXts80IgZb0X0JKkulxwbn/iKb5Ku/JysAgAIeCYA=
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:20:21 +0000
Message-ID: <E394A986-70D2-4864-B850-C50BCE267078@akamai.com>
References: <2A8C8B98-CBA9-4BF0-82C5-594B0F309F07@akamai.com> <FA5A7C084BDEF72CE3FC510B@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <FA5A7C084BDEF72CE3FC510B@PSB>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.53.21091200
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <498AD404FF2A6045B70C0AC6E73D8BEE@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-03_06:2021-10-01, 2021-10-03 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110030097
X-Proofpoint-GUID: e-R8rmFrWdTcchTemXhSh7_gKyth-p2b
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: e-R8rmFrWdTcchTemXhSh7_gKyth-p2b
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-03_06,2021-10-01_02,2020-04-07_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110030097
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gZicFTXZ3Tzy8fKDtGZh6KbHjYY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:20:30 -0000

>    (1) While Nomcoms have rarely taken advantage of it, my
    understanding from the beginning of the Nomcom model has been
    that Nomcoms are free to recruit, twist arms, etc.   This may be
    the year for doing that.

I am sure that they know this is possible, and as I said elsewhere, I recall every nomcom chair asking for candidates multiple times. I do not know what they are doing behind the scenes,  I only went by the list of nominees.

>    (2) I think looking at things in terms of "want to be on the
    IESG?" may be the wrong question.

We disagree.

    (3) From observation of results, Nomcoms are often inclined to
    return incumbents who are willing to serve again (and who have
    not been absolute disasters).

Sure, for understandable reasons. But perhaps those known reasons should not always be the priority.  See for example, the thread around this post, https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/66ZswAhKfCCQ9RVYKnr8Jflh9eI/ and the community survey blog post https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf-community-survey-2021/