Re: Want to be on the IESG?
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 07 October 2021 20:41 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8680C3A0E3C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PRgoeIld5oRv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 455E53A0E46 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93A5548064; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 22:41:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id C74484E9A25; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 22:41:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 22:41:10 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Want to be on the IESG?
Message-ID: <YV9bZu1Zo7wlmkij@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <7a73471d-8591-a6d7-cacb-0a58b1ba070f@network-heretics.com> <F2914D95-A697-4EE4-9253-5C7C839DA05A@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F2914D95-A697-4EE4-9253-5C7C839DA05A@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jW7rPQXbvZt5ySsnhacEnLLV5JM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 20:41:22 -0000
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:55:34PM +0100, Stewart Bryant wrote: > The other big difference is that those making money out of the internet now seem to regard it as a natural resource to be exploited and not something to invest in as was done in the past. There is no IETF document or IETF leadership statement telling them not to. So why should they not ? I seriously can't wrap my head around the fact that we have a HRPC RG, but no "Common Good of the Internet" GEN WG or RG (*). And ISOC doesn't seem to have any collaborative platform/process to produce output either, other than leadership individual contribution. internet-policy@isoc.org is just the write-only complaints board. Cheers Toerless (*) I am mentioning HRPC not to criticise it, i think its great we have it. Instead i am mentioning it to claim that all the push back against having a WG/RG on Internet policy was/is using very similar (out of scope, not our expertise, go away) argument that could have equally been raised against HRPC. So i think there is just less interest in "Common Good of the Internet" in our leadership than they claim to have and IMHO should have.
- Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Michael Richardson
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Keith Moore
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Keith Moore
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? John C Klensin
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Lloyd W
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Keith Moore
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Andy Ringsmuth
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Lloyd W
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Keith Moore
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Donald Eastlake
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? John C Klensin
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Michael Richardson
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Stephen Farrell
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Stephen Farrell
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? John C Klensin
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Keith Moore
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Stewart Bryant
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Carsten Bormann
- RE: Want to be on the IESG? Ron Bonica
- leadership bodily presence requirements (was: Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Christian Huitema
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Keith Moore
- RE: Want to be on the IESG? Ron Bonica
- What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want to be… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? John C Klensin
- Re: What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want t… Keith Moore
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Toerless Eckert
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Keith Moore
- Re: What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want t… Toerless Eckert
- Re: What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want t… Keith Moore
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Toerless Eckert
- RE: What is "The Internet community" ? Re: Want t… Ron Bonica
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Lloyd W
- RE: Want to be on the IESG? Ron Bonica
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Carsten Bormann
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Lloyd W
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? John C Klensin
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Carsten Bormann
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? John C Klensin
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Toerless Eckert
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Keith Moore
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IES… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Manycouches] Think outside the box - Re: Wan… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Manycouches] Think outside the box - Re: Wan… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Manycouches] Think outside the box - Re: Wan… Jay Daley
- Re: [Manycouches] Think outside the box - Re: Wan… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the… Lloyd W
- Re: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the… Ali Mezgani
- Re: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the… Lloyd W
- Re: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the… S Moonesamy
- RE: Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the… Larry Masinter
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Salz, Rich
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Want to be on the IESG? John C Klensin