sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 17 January 2019 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89360130F55 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:52:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eYUJ2v0fxIqo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68165130E72 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D63B3808A; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:51:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 25192CA3; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:52:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CB8C9F; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:52:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ietf@ietf.org, wugh@ietf.org
reply-to: wugh@ietf.org
Subject: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:52:13 -0500
Message-ID: <25946.1547751133@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9xfkTba3T4bvISfv9iRuyduEaeg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:52:17 -0000

https://lwn.net/Articles/775963/ has an article about sr.ht.
In particular, it says:

As mentioned, sr.ht has not taken the approach of being yet another GitHub
clone. Instead, it is geared toward a mailing-list-centric approach, possibly
using the sr.ht mailing list component. The sr.ht-dev mailing list (seen at
right) provides an example of the user interface for that component. Unlike
some other forges or mailing-list replacements, it is not JavaScript-heavy—in
fact, sr.ht uses no JavaScript at all, so pages are small (less than 10KB on
average) and load quickly.

-----

I think that there may be many IETFers who will see some major advantages.
JavaScript-free, component based, email focused.  Probably also software
we can run ourselves.

I haven't had time to try it yet (just signed up for an account), but I will
put a draft or two on it, and see how I like it.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-