Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 22 January 2019 19:51 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99BD131007 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:51:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=ko9ZqY6I; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=kQ6zcwi0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mnD31RN7z5_T for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:51:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3B2128AFB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 30942 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2019 19:51:29 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=78dc.5c477441.k1901; bh=5M7MZ0xYw4dHLUDOffo/BY7eCrBQqsJKO7GWrDu0/G0=; b=ko9ZqY6IWuQvel+p6HsQGO6gnjCifvH59/LOuEzq83OQNnsE2LKCebiZPronWbUVKNLOJVGRTTfdrkxj5zAEKDiazRMfFh579mCAWxD8Twq/2zE9Cp5F2KJn7HKcBwO/PFdCkEahgOgTEf5p1uadu45PjDebK81QxDvtZG30oMIAxJ3G/szkrTTSLDmFzeLTv4ZEuyowv4ELU0b/LVZg3yVgyhJFg0rR4IAIuMXa3EN6COZECWUDtmbw8uvkNODY
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=78dc.5c477441.k1901; bh=5M7MZ0xYw4dHLUDOffo/BY7eCrBQqsJKO7GWrDu0/G0=; b=kQ6zcwi0S8Epe04JfCLg1wqMABMyzyA7Tm43ixdx0WqJWRRYsy3LrlYK426QO1EWeLn1/cNSfxc4KmT7d2v+LUw71gdjNT3IkraRHywJO3PcawXAnbrCpJWmv69RJpOOr9jpzXKY5QXxr8ZoPf5bcxpSOtSudc/4Ype3X+rppwVG36Bd+kuSPwvwlZFalx+8Ga7QGasrDBu57Loklmn0KGBehUBWVlfbaJ84zaF4x6WbU6Lwez+sOUEWyqymPkS+
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 22 Jan 2019 19:51:28 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8873C200D0DE76; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:51:28 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:51:28 -0500
Message-Id: <20190122195128.8873C200D0DE76@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github
In-Reply-To: <20190122172530.GB4303@localhost>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mEM01PV7d0WwiCP1iWbOKew3rrI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:51:33 -0000
In article <20190122172530.GB4303@localhost> you write: >My concern is that IETF business conducted off IETF lists might be >problematic. We have an answer to that: confirm consensus on IETF >mailing lists. I'm OK with that. But I would prefer to have a better >e-mail interface from GitHub/GitLab/BitBucket/etc. It's more than that. IETF business is supposed to be all subject to the Note Well which affects patents and other issues. We have a reasonably well agreed way to put the Note Well on the front page of github repositories doing IETF work. If we have random subgroups doing work on other random platforms with random notices or non-notices, it potentially creates complex messes that will be hard to clean up. R's, John
- sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Michael Richardson
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Richard Barnes
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Leif Johansson
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Lars Eggert
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Randy Bush
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Richard Barnes
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Eric Rescorla
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Lloyd Wood
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Carsten Bormann
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Joel M. Halpern
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Eric Rescorla
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github tom petch
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Richard Barnes
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github tom petch
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Nico Williams
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Nico Williams
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github John Levine
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Hector Santos
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Richard Barnes
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Eric Rescorla
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Michael Richardson
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Nico Williams
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Hector Santos
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Christian Huitema
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Richard Barnes
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github tom petch
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Michael Richardson
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Yoav Nir
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Lars Eggert
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Fernando Gont
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Matthew A. Miller
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Nico Williams
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Bob Hinden
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Matthew A. Miller
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Lars Eggert
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Nico Williams
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github lloyd.wood
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Randy Bush
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Eric Rescorla
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Alissa Cooper
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Alissa Cooper
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github lloyd.wood
- Re: github is not git, was sr.ht --- "sir hat" --… John Levine
- Re: github is not git, was sr.ht --- "sir hat" --… Randy Bush
- Re: github is not git, was sr.ht --- "sir hat" --… lloyd.wood
- Re: github is not git, was sr.ht --- "sir hat" --… John R Levine
- Re: github is not git, was sr.ht --- "sir hat" --… Nick Hilliard
- Re: github is not git, was sr.ht --- "sir hat" --… lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Eric Rescorla
- Re: github is not git, was sr.ht --- "sir hat" --… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Hector Santos
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Eric Rescorla
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Hector Santos
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github lloyd.wood
- Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github Eric Rescorla