Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 30 January 2019 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82FE130FEC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:18:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.04
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.04 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cYtG_IXDS2E0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7D8B130FE6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n18-v6so815557lji.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:18:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ApnzeeVCgeaU++7QChlvo2Qy26nkyumz2iLsEpIy3Bs=; b=Ib2XLo4Diw3VPF+yRVyQT3xao33RYQy70G5g+rtlSCCq/7pzYjE3t48Hb0deBkkK/n MkgzQeEWw8L+GFHgN9+lOj7wyeszaXEyaSTcKPVwVkZ8m+T19AVFE2ov9mrJvcjEyYI9 /zfIDC0RUxGb9jyds22lCsBz6n50nfn5U/mH8V8Jv2skmdVnRgbRyC77NZajd/1OOE8Z zbhiTNykNBiT+8D/r+6cPKF3qRKCOCytfFPMYR6GhjhpN/Txf7BrgBQqpXKjEgErPZl5 irPtapBAtbsRuQEps2tqtr35t5vek35YjGm/yuV99vCrT0+4pygj67eYPKUmQPsub859 gAMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ApnzeeVCgeaU++7QChlvo2Qy26nkyumz2iLsEpIy3Bs=; b=rvPt/4Sa8Ihr8FIhSWxqZ3QRKv66t9t/PKORjX8rJCf8QlIK9fCO30CfgQgT9CyaNr uyLOd/Hd+X6IBhTX0CCVfIQDMPpzA9imSf757WsTYKMWMfxr9g7ygW+TbgiLBV4t1u/a 8wERbVfaQnvtIsQAfh4UncyeIyl86/2X3rB1cWHLo11kJJyXizuJ0m8gDUDM6oQmBF4x NBwwshDbKFv9fpfM6uBtCATSBdZEeT77vwBkKZHirHdKcpuxc32XMXXmH7vkFuADbK/B 6TT6a/MxjIeb4y2/WVOFh7akYv6rua1uZKmFzt/NJelppluk+UsBHcApjrBODpUcB7JN 5CZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukc2MI5ITGZlHtFiHuYmBlpYL+2Aol2lfDqRNvkkUSD9Heo6v6F/ 9IYMvfx4egzmSgV1tCdQvXAfC3bqrfP6ZiBQhwQKWw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7SmHHJKdZOUAwGQz+PUsozSx2LKqKW7t3dYFhMZ84fpx82Xvj/w5KnWZ9PTes200e5aU9Eg8TZraMrX1Af44M=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5dd9:: with SMTP id v86-v6mr25730351lje.86.1548883117844; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:18:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <25946.1547751133@localhost> <2062850122.1176466.1548052316757@mail.yahoo.com> <7C2EF2A7-B267-43BB-9A07-56835D184E71@tzi.org> <1a427a5b-dba7-5d18-393a-c39e99e1fbd8@joelhalpern.com> <20190121152616.GE81907@kduck.mit.edu> <009b01d4b238$901cb460$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <16559.1548194651@localhost> <5C47A7DF.7030307@isdg.net> <CAL02cgSkcH-uO1MFPVLDrgF_1QvH59U37iXMN7u4AORbz7s2Yg@mail.gmail.com> <5C4FCDED.8080208@isdg.net> <CABcZeBOnEgMKD8TY_YM_P_LpuY1LfyGP7CTEFEJ-LZJdZ8B-6g@mail.gmail.com> <5C5193B8.4020002@isdg.net> <1667455659.1028585.1548882883701@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1667455659.1028585.1548882883701@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:17:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOcdRhLxmMaKnQ7LPDSbxs2r=yndtA3bpkTp8RWB9oLwA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github
To: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: hsantos@isdg.net, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000009c3ab0580b3743e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SOd4SmQEtoYVAeeTdwYQ84WEelg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:18:41 -0000

n Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:14 PM <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> So IETF draft development behaviour is changed by the whim of github
> corporate policy?
>

Uh, no, because once IETF drafts become drafts, they are developed in the
open.

This change affects how people develop their documents *before* they become
drafts and when they want them to be private.

-Ekr

that's nice...
>
> Lloyd Wood
> lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
>
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019, 11:08 pm, Hector Santos <hsantos=
> 40isdg.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> On 1/29/2019 12:14 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >
> >    Let's point out, GitHUB is free when your drafts are public storage.
> >    It is not free if you desire a private repository.
> >
> > This is no longer true:
> > https://github.blog/2019-01-07-new-year-new-github/
>
> That should change things. Thanks for pointing it out.
>
>
> --
> HLS
>
>
>