IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 22 January 2019 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFEA129A87 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:16:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pSnuqSsGm1lD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:16:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cichlid.maple.relay.mailchannels.net (cichlid.maple.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.214.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 698E7128B14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:16:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7D450380A; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:16:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a72.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [100.96.29.126]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C61B4502975; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:16:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a72.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.16.2); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:16:54 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Dime-Skirt: 42e7c15411c81057_1548195413923_3641043032
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1548195413923:1124016496
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1548195413922
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a72.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a72.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A41D8068A; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:16:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=Oo1obkLTwmDyuK wE/4A611TqJps=; b=cTy4Jbg4u4G46nKxgSzFYfjFIGkpiAFKqtsQpimwL6Yl33 M5dlloyRZcThbbTVcIjoK65jE8CkbKd4/4Q4ZYtPwhniuET62aDYRe+NxagO7Pfg amo1YpsS8PGVtpQ9kJk/DT9oH87Z1n0ni8vOJPHZGuW+i3kqp0asojycu3aB0=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a72.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D56B280691; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:16:49 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a72
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: sr.ht --- "sir hat" --- alternatives to Github
Message-ID: <20190122221648.GC4303@localhost>
References: <20190122172530.GB4303@localhost> <20190122195128.8873C200D0DE76@ary.qy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190122195128.8873C200D0DE76@ary.qy>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrheekgdduheekucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghloheplhhotggrlhhhohhsthdpihhnvghtpedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtohepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zGE_dTTFyvcLllhLmXi_TNMq5SI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:16:57 -0000

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:51:28PM -0500, John Levine wrote:
> In article <20190122172530.GB4303@localhost> you write:
> >My concern is that IETF business conducted off IETF lists might be
> >problematic.  We have an answer to that: confirm consensus on IETF
> >mailing lists.  I'm OK with that.  But I would prefer to have a better
> >e-mail interface from GitHub/GitLab/BitBucket/etc.
> 
> It's more than that.  IETF business is supposed to be all subject to
> the Note Well which affects patents and other issues. We have a
> reasonably well agreed way to put the Note Well on the front page of
> github repositories doing IETF work.
> 
> If we have random subgroups doing work on other random platforms with
> random notices or non-notices, it potentially creates complex messes
> that will be hard to clean up.

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email