Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)
Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Mon, 20 September 2004 13:10 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA00204; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9O1r-0005cF-16; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:16:27 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9NkV-0000nb-4M; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:58:31 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9Njv-0000TJ-VD for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:57:56 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA28129 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:57:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wyvern.icir.org ([192.150.187.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9Nq5-0005Ke-Ur for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:04:18 -0400
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [68.76.113.50]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8KCvlNK082763; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 05:57:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mallman@icir.org)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (guns.icir.org [68.76.113.50]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66BF77AFCA; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:57:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7B81E07E0; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:50:04 -0400 (EDT)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <4118.1095344984@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: Wild Horses
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:50:03 -0400
Message-Id: <20040920125004.1A7B81E07E0@lawyers.icir.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1442921454=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
> I think that we should have Foretec arrange all of the 2005 meetings > and run them, period. No arrangements to "transfer", etc. I second this. I have often lamented that the IETF takes way too long to do anything. But, this schedule for potentially transferring our meeting planning starting in 2005 seems too aggressive to me. That said, making other changes outlined in Carl's document (e.g., for IT support) before 2006 seems perfectly reasonable if we can reach consensus and get things going before then. allman -- Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- first steps (was The other parts of the report...) scott bradner
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… scott bradner
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Margaret Wasserman
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… John C Klensin
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Steve Crocker
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Carl Malamud
- What we need done (Re: first steps (was The other… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… John C Klensin
- Re: What we need done (Re: first steps (was The o… avri
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Dave Crocker
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Dave Crocker
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… graham.travers
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… graham.travers
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Steve Crocker
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Joel Jaeggli
- IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) shogunx
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Tim Chown
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) william(at)elan.net
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Hadmut Danisch
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Dick St.Peters
- Re: IETF 62 Lars Eggert
- Re: IETF 62 Sam Hartman
- Re: IETF 62 Lars Eggert
- Re: IETF 62 John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 62 Lars Eggert
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Mark Allman
- RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62) Robin Uyeshiro
- Re: IETF 62 Scott Michel
- Re: IETF 62 Michael D Frisch
- Re: IETF 62 Ted Faber