Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Mon, 20 September 2004 13:10 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA00204; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9O1r-0005cF-16; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:16:27 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9NkV-0000nb-4M; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:58:31 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9Njv-0000TJ-VD for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:57:56 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA28129 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:57:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wyvern.icir.org ([192.150.187.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9Nq5-0005Ke-Ur for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:04:18 -0400
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [68.76.113.50]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8KCvlNK082763; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 05:57:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mallman@icir.org)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (guns.icir.org [68.76.113.50]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66BF77AFCA; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:57:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7B81E07E0; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:50:04 -0400 (EDT)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <4118.1095344984@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: Wild Horses
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:50:03 -0400
Message-Id: <20040920125004.1A7B81E07E0@lawyers.icir.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1442921454=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3

> I think that we should have Foretec arrange all of the 2005 meetings
> and run them, period.  No arrangements to "transfer", etc.

I second this.

I have often lamented that the IETF takes way too long to do anything.
But, this schedule for potentially transferring our meeting planning
starting in 2005 seems too aggressive to me.

That said, making other changes outlined in Carl's document (e.g., for
IT support) before 2006 seems perfectly reasonable if we can reach
consensus and get things going before then.

allman


--
Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf