IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)

Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de> Fri, 17 September 2004 09:04 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA17313; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 05:04:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C8Ekd-0003w6-2Q; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 05:09:55 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C8EXk-000489-2j; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 04:56:36 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C8ETn-0003Xo-Oq for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 04:52:31 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA16650 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 04:52:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sklave3.rackland.de ([213.133.101.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C8EZH-0003ew-Ns for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 04:58:13 -0400
Received: (from hadmut@localhost) by sklave3.rackland.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) id i8H8qSWG001204 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:52:28 +0200
From: Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:52:28 +0200
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20040917085228.GA1019@danisch.de>
References: <20040911210653.A62C48958A@newdev.harvard.edu> <012c01c49b03$ef7f21b0$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21> <3744.1095366813@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> <20040917082340.GC11438@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040917082340.GC11438@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Subject: Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32

On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:23:40AM +0100, Tim Chown wrote:
> 
> With the impending visa/biometrics/etc mess for the US, having more of the
> IETFs elsewhere would reduce the travel burden.  Maybe Canada?

I'd really appreciate that.

AFAIK the US require taking fingerprints even from europeans
starting at Oct 1. So IETF60 was the last IETF I could attend
without having my fingerprints taken. I feel everything but
comfortable with that way to treat people.

Currently IETF is held at east- and west-coast. Why not 
change this into south/north? Canada in Summertime, 
Mexiko in Wintertime.

regards
Hadmut



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email