IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> Wed, 15 September 2004 09:25 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA15921; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 05:25:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C7W7g-0007JG-Su; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 05:30:46 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C7Vu4-0002Jx-QJ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 05:16:40 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C7VpM-0001Bo-2V for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 05:11:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA14919 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 05:11:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C7VuQ-0006z7-Fd for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 05:17:03 -0400
Received: from dfnjgl21 (c-24-1-99-5.client.comcast.net[24.1.99.5]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004091509110401500i3vfge> (Authid: sdawkins@comcast.net); Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:11:05 +0000
Message-ID: <012c01c49b03$ef7f21b0$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20040911210653.A62C48958A@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 04:11:06 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

We kind of went away from the first half of Harald/Scott's notes, 
which was

From: "scott bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>

>
> Harald asks
>> I feel some urgency to make sure that we have meeting arrangements 
>> in place
>> for 2005 - without imperiling our ability to make the best 
>> long-term
>> choices for the IETF.
>
> the logical path seems to be to ask Foretec to start making 
> arrangements
> for next year's meetings - doing so in a way that could be 
> transfered
> to another meeting manager if things came to that would be ideal but
> may be hard

Or, to ask the same question another way, how long can we wait to have 
SOMEone making arrangements for a meeting in March 2005?

Spencer 



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf