Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrative Procedures

["Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I agree with Russ. I think the trust and the IAOC have a bit different focus
and it makes sense at times have a different chair for the different
positions.

This does not mean that we couldn't go in the future back to the common
IAOC/Trust chair, but currently the work split would make sense.

Cheers,

Jonne.


On 4/7/08 10:45 PM, "ext Russ Housley" <[e-mail]> wrote:

> The IAOC and the IETF Trust have different focus.  The idea behind
> the separate chair is to make sure that someone is paying attention
> to the items that need to be handled by each body in a timely
> manner.  It is simply a mechanism to help ensure that noting is
> falling between the cracks.
> 
> Russ
> 
> --On April 4, 2008 11:50:23 AM +0200 Harald Alvestrand
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> After considering the comments so far, I think I disagree with having a
>> separate Trust chair.
>> 
>> The idea behind making the IAOC be the Trustees was, among other things,
>> to make sure that we didn't create yet another nexus of control in the
>> labyrinth of committees; I understood the legal existence of the
>> Trustees as something different (in name) from the IAOC to be strictly
>> something we did for legal purposes
>> 
>> If the IAOC chair is overburdened by having to manage the IAOC in two
>> different contexts, get him (or her) a secretary.
>> 
>> I agree with John's comment that leaving the current trustees in charge
>> on dissolution of the IAOC is inappropriate; for one thing, that also
>> removes all the recall mechanisms.
>> Figure out something else to do in this case.
>> 
>>                            Harald
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

-- 
Jonne Soininen
Nokia Siemens Networks

Tel: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]


_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf