Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Wed, 25 February 2015 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08D51A911D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:28:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BFy8Fvxsi8ab for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:28:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A561A9162 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:28:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1842; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1424906909; x=1426116509; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=CuxLC3S8PswJafbQfJ4QYiUUGfqgP3c6d2aOlduXcB8=; b=OhGg6hze2vI7dnW6ytuxrWSsek8eYGmN1Jbkci/2T58UeoGum8nKQppQ +H8+Mxb+HVW0XZYEMw3RskLNSUL6sjKCPglF/qThp3mumDQyo+53LLcmE Gqse/r6XUBT90mN3n5J6A/3RNkiWbaaxHcVmIUMy+Os8Ng9RQzoFwYSu4 I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ApBwBTWu5U/5tdJa1bgwJSWgS9MoVyhXACgSVDAQEBAQEBfIQQAQEEbgsQAgEIGBYBFyERJQIEAQ0FFAeIAAMRDdAnDYVAAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSKFX6BPYEHgUgRAVAHEgGEGAWKIoVBg2CDYD+BRoEbjB6CSoM+IoIPgV9vgQQHFyJ/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,648,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="126992137"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2015 23:28:28 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1PNSSBu018793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:28:28 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.45]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:28:28 -0600
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: Dean Bogdanovic <deanb@juniper.net>, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
Thread-Topic: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
Thread-Index: AQHQUFOkH7HlE1Nn2E6m2YbduHXwrZ0AmaaAgADYLwD///PXAIAAihQAgAAMnACAAAG1gIAACV+AgAAH3oD//51dgIAAh2iA//98MAAAEM/CAAABFLeAAAAwIQAAAcnqgAACz5QA//99nwA=
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:28:27 +0000
Message-ID: <D1139888.3E952%eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <20150224170152.6224.60832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <09B0A2B7-7D6B-4365-B58C-AAD97C3BE73D@lucidvision.com> <B32A64D5-0B07-4E01-92B1-DEAF21002EE7@netapp.com> <D1132FAF.3E752%eckelcu@cisco.com> <54EDF486.20000@gmail.com> <D275D180-272B-43C7-BDF0-FE2B438DEB60@lucidvision.com> <4723EB73-47F2-4408-ADAA-EF78A6A14FDA@nominum.com> <54EE0865.4090101@gmail.com> <CAHw9_iKA7bgZH6iJLw1y7=qz6MJDePgUbCeOtHXnaajCKshRnw@mail.gmail.com> <D1136BA7.3E85D%eckelcu@cisco.com> <54EE2DD7.1030408@gmail.com> <D1136F2B.3E87C%eckelcu@cisco.com> <54EE3016.3040106@gmail.com> <DB3PR06MB219F1410E358FF8608F1340BF170@DB3PR06MB219.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <54EE389A.3080904@gmail.com> <FE093242-C4C9-4602-B576-50391F3B1437@lucidvision.com> <D656F2B2-E848-4444-96EB-0D67653A4A46@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <D656F2B2-E848-4444-96EB-0D67653A4A46@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117
x-originating-ip: [10.24.213.76]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <21FFFEA87842B54FACA60C477BBE51A9@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EWbU7YTxXL_bQ1PNsr4y-NIIPi0>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:28:31 -0000

Hi Dean,

I think the short answer to your question is yes. A more complete version
of that answer is available at:
https://communities.cisco.com/message/175254#175254

I have verified that you do not need to register with Cisco DevNet to view
the content within the community setup for the Hackathon:
https://communities.cisco.com/community/developer/ietf-hackathon

You do need to login to post to it. This requirement could be relaxed,
thus allowing anonymous posts, but I don¹t view that as a particularly
good solution.

Cheers,
Charles


On 2/25/15, 3:15 PM, "Dean Bogdanovic" <deanb@juniper.net> wrote:

>My biggest issue with this hackathon is requirement to register with
>Cisco DevNet. This tells me it is a corporate event, not an IETF event
>and am asking if Cisco DevNet org is trying to increase its membership.
>
>And +1 to Melinda's email
>
>On Feb 25, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
>wrote:
>
>> +1
>> 
>>> On Feb 25, 2015:4:03 PM, at 4:03 PM, Melinda Shore
>>><melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2/25/15 11:57 AM, James Gannon wrote:
>>>> Am I the only one who think that a rebranding on this might be the
>>>>easiest solution for everyone?
>>> 
>>> I think it's by far the best solution.  The expectation that you'd
>>> need a Cisco login and visit a Cisco web page to see responses to
>>> questions raised on the IETF mailing list seems unreasonable to me.
>>> 
>>> If it's an IETF event, move the "community" page to an IETF resource.
>>> We've got multiple wikis, and I really can't imagine who thought it
>>> was a better idea to use an access-controlled Cisco one.
>>> 
>>> In the meantime, thanks to Charles for posting a little more
>>> information to the mailing list.
>>> 
>>> Melinda
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>