IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 25 February 2015 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7935C1A0111 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:00:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Xr9xxfVGD-7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E43E1A0033 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by labgd6 with SMTP id gd6so5663224lab.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:00:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yYC9wiYz/vMd0LokgT+e9j7ukExWN1ZnggjMr1DAgfA=; b=VeufaKVETb7sKA36FI+uacI39jWeWwrLa+ZxNWmb7Xi6kVXqeF47Io6xXcUFhX8Uxr PXB0EQ710MH4nCSdLvt5rOQMSLWUbAyHrXbncI9rNB/34us1U38nnqZ46oTYV0soROU/ N5XvB5qnOR9SFPVPXWNeVoFHSGCGVh3uzae6cdmC+U6Jn64lKgpvDHcj+9YPoq6jKLLV 5TNK8b/mwaiMILI7uXIMyjrTZv3sVFiu1ehGqs50A+KULKehT4WjUhRU6Y+nqcBBDCw4 wmOBypo9urLOhVPVf9FPOJMUrWjBAN4Gs7nJFjLI5RTufV1wMnd8BH+vgIh0giSoW5AW 9kDw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.7.38 with SMTP id g6mr3932075laa.65.1424887247429; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:00:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.167.101 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:00:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D1132FAF.3E752%eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <20150224170152.6224.60832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <09B0A2B7-7D6B-4365-B58C-AAD97C3BE73D@lucidvision.com> <B32A64D5-0B07-4E01-92B1-DEAF21002EE7@netapp.com> <D1132FAF.3E752%eckelcu@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:00:47 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH4XFxrvj7XGreMOsUJZV9ggd-YjzkBOmCdBJupYYRJviA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2906c3a646a050fed6a22"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vzv0De6zw03DCAbniEV4pHExClo>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:00:51 -0000

It would be nice to tie this into CodeMatch for future events to track
connections between coding projects and drafts/RFCs.  We'll be providing an
update of our work on CodeMatch at the admin plenary.  We will also have a
UI expert at a table to get feedback on Sunday of the IETF for our mock-ups
and prototype work and hope you will visit the team, I believe noon-5PM.

Here is a link to high-level background information:
http://www.ietf.org/codematch/

Thanks,
Kathleen

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com
> wrote:

> On 2/25/15, 12:42 AM, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> >On 2015-2-24, at 20:48, Thomas D. Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>      There is an awful lot of blatant vendor advertising on the signup
> for
> >>this hackathon which seems inappropriate for IETF-related work.
> >
> >Agreed. Why is this not simply on an IETF wiki?
> >
> >It's also a bit confusing to see this advertised as an IETF hackathon
> >when most of the listed technologies aren't (yet) IETF work items.
>
> True, and hopefully the work at the Hackathon will provide useful input
> into BOFs, etc., that helps make more informed decisions about whether and
> how to proceed with forming working groups. If you have another technology
> you would like to propose and for which we can identify a champion to help
> drive it, we can add it, as we are doing today for SFC.
>
> Cheers,
> Charles
>
> >
> >Lars
>
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email