Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 26 February 2015 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D637C1A8948 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:16:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hwHUhl2TYY68 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:16:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5516A1A6FE7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:16:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [50.189.173.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BC428A031 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:16:36 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 19:16:34 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
Message-ID: <20150226001634.GL3297@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <D1136F2B.3E87C%eckelcu@cisco.com> <54EE3016.3040106@gmail.com> <DB3PR06MB219F1410E358FF8608F1340BF170@DB3PR06MB219.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <54EE389A.3080904@gmail.com> <FE093242-C4C9-4602-B576-50391F3B1437@lucidvision.com> <D656F2B2-E848-4444-96EB-0D67653A4A46@juniper.net> <D1139888.3E952%eckelcu@cisco.com> <D22D1246-CDFD-41ED-B08C-91D8F4401DFD@lucidvision.com> <20150225234554.GK3297@mx1.yitter.info> <216D6F3F-5028-4177-BAEF-D939492329FE@lucidvision.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <216D6F3F-5028-4177-BAEF-D939492329FE@lucidvision.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/liARscwTL_6Wb21_sqxetFjuaaw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:16:40 -0000

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 06:47:32PM -0500, Thomas D. Nadeau wrote:
> 	For non-commercial use, github is free.  The IETF is considered a non-commercial organization. 
> 

I did not see anywhere in this thread the complaint that Cisco was
trying to charge people money for this hackathon.  AFAICT, it's just
as free from them.

I am perfectly prepared to say that this entire business could have
been handled in a way that didn't result in a huge thread on the IETF
list.  But complaining about one company's promotion of its products
by suggesting an alternative company that does something extremely
similar sounds to me like a complaint about the particular company,
and not about the technique.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com