Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 24 February 2015 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1860C1A8941 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:30:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rvnWyMCM6rhy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77F81A8928 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3126DA01F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:30:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F0C53E0B1; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (64.89.235.67) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (64.89.235.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:30:04 -0800
Received: from [10.0.20.107] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:30:04 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <9A584215-74D0-4035-99EC-1F49B0C73F2C@lucidvision.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:29:55 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <6AC7040D-77E6-4D59-89DD-82EE641220BF@nominum.com>
References: <20150224170152.6224.60832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DBC7E705-B163-46E8-AC9B-97BDC33E7C68@apple.com> <54ECBC5E.2030001@dcrocker.net> <CAHw9_iKpmEOFyZ5Mi=6KcsEoLHDVCwFTi5q_0GfK-d5B1X_Hdg@mail.gmail.com> <7E5194B1-4717-4225-85C6-E969EF7800A7@apple.com> <D1120FE3.3E483%eckelcu@cisco.com> <54ECDDA0.6010904@dcrocker.net> <8DB221D1-5AEC-4BB9-A44B-E326B9AE8FF4@juniper.net> <A9B04584-D55B-4249-BDBE-B3497321A886@nominum.com> <9A584215-74D0-4035-99EC-1F49B0C73F2C@lucidvision.com>
To: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/U2H54QrcIo3GzJfvHJX2R8Idd9U>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:30:07 -0000

On Feb 24, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
> 	If you take a look at the URL in question I think its self-explanatory why there is confusion about whether this is a vendor-sponsored event, a vendor event, or maybe something related to the IETF.  The fact that there are links here to register for DevNet, the Cisco logo, etc... is confusing at best as to what this is.

Here's the announcement email:

> The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is holding a Hackathon to encourage developers to discuss, collaborate and develop utilities, ideas, sample code and solutions that show practical implementations of IETF standards. It takes place just before IETF 92, and it’s free and open to everyone.

This text, in an email from the IETF Secretariat, is immediately followed to a cisco.com URL.   So a disinterested reader would naturally assume that the event is an IETF event, and that Cisco is somehow involved in organizing it, or maybe is sponsoring it (e.g., paying for the room or something).   I do not actually know the truth of the matter, but the meeting info is very clear about what the hackathon is about.   So while I guess I can understand that you might be confused about who is sponsoring it, I am still at a loss as to why that's a problem.