IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: pgp signing in van

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Mon, 09 September 2013 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A790411E8216 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.138, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4JdbRg6GSw2G for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32ABD11E821C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id er7so6229385obc.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WjrjtC+cpcCIV2lnQx2gjdHCClmyqJ4lSLobq4tNq0o=; b=dDFLewgLuesjF5ts4qKr/81LIYTWK5NClggGKM/KyCuFpij5En2od4M5YJS5VUWLM7 iOhO8cLHfc0wzpnTCl6IElxbORUEtPOf+6bMT3qEe1OlQBVs3ZpbFVYkx2XkR7TXO3fd dNFQouIh/3Qql/dEL5DsXM6QibpzJce8Vby8IntMCHIDWD3IYri4f9kIYFo3ka2eLH51 TmjTLrkn7YvGbzVrvm9JXr5KSAJvIVyDDOsCeKSfuy4/y5XdVAtRrjzMAEyi/GHtV2kJ kk8ECel2pP0ryjKufxsi82HM0+4IpZiC4zK/LeHvEdlewzx1loVxN8kk1CW5G67wsKr4 BBcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkh8/nIsvux/bhJ+YO3lw872TzRDqLsBwJYRJv2zSG8wjjVlNrLF38xDZAjbZdSsaDXuFVS
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.63.116 with SMTP id f20mr11955122oes.29.1378746854631; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.31.74 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <522E017F.70507@stpeter.im>
References: <m2zjrq22wp.wl%randy@psg.com> <2309.1378487864@sandelman.ca> <522A5A45.7020208@isi.edu> <CA2A6416-7168-480A-8CE1-FB1EB6290C77@nominum.com> <522A71A5.6030808@gmail.com> <6DE840CA-2F3D-4AE5-B86A-90B39E07A35F@nominum.com> <CAPv4CP_ySqyEa57jUocVxX6M6DYef=DDdoB+XwmDMt5F9eGn1A@mail.gmail.com> <18992.1378676025@sandelman.ca> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077527BC7A@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <522CF86C.9040909@stpeter.im> <522D03C4.5060807@isdg.net> <522D0617.5030101@stpeter.im> <3FEF8F74963AF3D7771BE40C@caldav.corp.apple.com> <522E017F.70507@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 13:14:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgR0swpLCag2JoBQvVTxgNg1SFvSc6YWECHc1cHqm_t7Vw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pgp signing in van
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2189e817cf904e5f684ec"
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 17:14:21 -0000

It also makes it obvious to everyone that Peter is using PGP.  Which serves
a pedagogical function, I guess. :)


On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 9/9/13 11:02 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > --On September 8, 2013 at 5:19:51 PM -0600 Peter Saint-Andre
> > <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> >
> >>> But until the MUAs across the board support it out of the box,
> >>> I believe most people don't know about it or know what it
> >>> means.
> >>
> >> So that's an opportunity to educate people. For instance, perhaps
> >> the Internet Society might be interested in taking on that task.
> >
> > Is there a reason you choose to use "inline" signing with PGP
> > rather than multipart/signed? Is that a technical reason (e.g.,
> > poor interoperability)?
>
> Ignorance or misconfiguration in my use of Thunderbird, it seems.
>
> Peter
>
> - --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSLgF/AAoJEOoGpJErxa2pnG8P/RpJj1SDr1plL3myoumgi4iS
> 0RLDNqq+2J+aiuDOccVJZYRITWFo3HmP3XD+nuDXiVxVUl+vuDhWHhWzQxtV04DS
> AUTN5mgY7Z5z2wfECFzC2MmqEG9tVD7i/gTij8cHTHyFuMvF27X32nTe/gxpo0eu
> 5cOhbzt2YWyF0nZff8cbQ+7o6d8RtaqE6G+jJVS4qUWeqEhYoFjjIGWieHZaNmw2
> U/CQfYnAbpph/D38QDP/Tw8UJkNLXlukrbKPKtd+8Z/KAxGYkldabD01Frdkt5ZF
> k2PosNHHpy9Ob61SH8N/vrAO/NF4c6VYEoAk8yqCgYLLNH3BSc3fSUoGjF47VU8f
> PMKW/Hz9cG/1P5VhVTHNPx50b5Auuglo36pLIvlJjYzT8cZCpaCElhn4dScKLMLt
> //E+/EdTs6gnayBgbok31NXPWr4ORMlaff8jSinVK08COIGyCyul+9vo2/vs4WdI
> XZ8ToqmXUg/0d0KfRozqCQwKDHHqdkYIfTt8/rLDheXUDTTuvKWxmmLLxXs6CXMU
> kMQ99IaRraoAVWaEiUhIdLH3Ewj7ibFsqx9UruvUX5irqDO9SbjlJC7b41iHgUIG
> HBJiH3w947+mHLIXFJ2G9dBcv+CuOYVATqScu0jSDbsWE6xsqS1miNofyr1+al49
> wcogO/B8kXm7cSHJjce5
> =cGPH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email