Re: was: not really pgp signing in van
Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Wed, 11 September 2013 19:08 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44E121E8130 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.212, BAYES_20=-0.74, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dfyi-th7cE4m for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A46921F84CD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id el20so7898677lab.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mwG75Cr4/nuZ9/sn4b/aMGKQF6+2PQMmIi54r+BiSIM=; b=jqtU2vtHPy5zkuivNOpEp2ejKx+9ntoKq0qRvcaK9ocM+R/o+42PhgBbtffdGYCUmR As9EZn+RgmMIG1d7x/Xrjcsivighko6P0i7IbmGlEGroSpm+Kn0S0LoC8By6PykqrC8o rNqkGcfImGVxUoFReyO4wdARqZdiiLNb+GsQASPKWLMD9krOjcuLuQQOF/xwubpqdo5F /CQSR4f8YuNOS90WA0z54hMaziieqIBRiCqk4+ogCAgamOB5vag3Se4d763/pT2A9UIU pEhmpJ46EBtEuTmw5OHOvkCHw52zNksKVAcqtpOCCPk0ZwusQaEnadx02Ilzo39+2MXP 7Kww==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.42.103 with SMTP id n7mr3909668lbl.6.1378926405451; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.148.165 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130911063431.0bc95118@resistor.net>
References: <20130910010719.33978.qmail@joyce.lan> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077527E234@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309092125360.34090@joyce.lan> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077527E488@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAMm+LwhZ9OKesZW+kFct5Gps6_JBzcNUUBQ-y5J21zMcxmL6EQ@mail.gmail.com> <241D1DD6-C096-49D6-A05B-33638846BF15@nominum.com> <CAMm+LwhhUzDX=AaJXSCkqJofHQ9ZiN11GmCw-reO0OPmNC4fyA@mail.gmail.com> <E2ECE63C-D8E4-4A5A-BEA3-295C027D0E71@nominum.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309101745410.46654@joyce.lan> <B27CD2F3-D71E-446A-9166-AC05B49718F4@nominum.com> <CAMm+LwiDCA1-KCm_Sj757Ty67qn1y0QFNoCd76qMxTAhOMXj7w@mail.gmail.com> <31D54C08-0246-4CE3-A958-18BAAE59FA0C@nominum.com> <F6A860A8-BB7C-46F4-9AEB-D39237C6585A@checkpoint.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130911063431.0bc95118@resistor.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:06:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwi1_YzROF5hfC+o50NtK=2+A3VtwgOQjdHOb3OObxXxgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: was: not really pgp signing in van
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133659c9185a904e6205206"
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:08:15 -0000
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:41 AM, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote: > Hi Yoav, > At 03:28 11-09-2013, Yoav Nir wrote: > >> I don't think you'd even need the threats. >> > > [snip] > > Notice the important parts of that pitch. A sense of danger; Making the >> target feel either patriotic or a humanitarian; Sharing a "secret" with the >> target, making him part of the "inner circle". Making the target feel >> important, like "only your cooperation can help us stop the next attack". >> If this pitch is executed correctly, by the end, the target is asking for >> an NSL as CYA. I've seen this kind of thing done once years ago, but it was >> done very poorly and didn't work. >> > > Yes. > > My reading of Phillip Hallam-Baker's comment is that there isn't anything > to worry about in relation to Comodo except that he does not have any > knowledge about the operational side. John Levine asked how likely they > would risk their reputation. Theodore Ts'o mentioned that there really is > no incentive for them to do a good job. > Since the operations side is in Salford UK, a National Security Letter would have no force there. I am not aware of any similar provision in UK law which is in any case constrained by European Union privacy law, European Human Rights law etc. And it is a firmly established principle of English law that the courts cannot interfere with any action in parliament and that an injunction obtained in England has no effect in Scotland (yes really). So if people are really worried, get me tickets to the Edinburgh festival and return airfare and we can have a talk. But you would probably be disappointed by what I had to say. If I did have something to say I would go talk to one of the members of parliament I know from university, school, family, etc. Incidentally the worst British judge of the 20th century is no longer on the bench and the super-injunction stupidity has come to an end with his career. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
- Re: pgp signing in van Scott Kitterman
- Re: pgp signing in van Scott Kitterman
- Re: pgp signing in van Melinda Shore
- pgp signing in van Randy Bush
- Re: pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: pgp signing in van Dave Crocker
- Re: pgp signing in van Scott Kitterman
- RE: pgp signing in van l.wood
- Re: pgp signing in van Russ Housley
- Re: pgp signing in van Michael Richardson
- Re: pgp signing in van Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van Joe Touch
- Re: pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van Melinda Shore
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van Melinda Shore
- Re: pgp signing in van Joe Touch
- Re: pgp signing in van Scott Kitterman
- Re: pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van Scott Brim
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van Melinda Shore
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van Melinda Shore
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van Pete Resnick
- Re: pgp signing in van Theodore Ts'o
- Re: pgp signing in van Hector Santos
- Re: pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: pgp signing in van Hector Santos
- Re: pgp signing in van John C Klensin
- Re: pgp signing in van Michael Richardson
- Re: pgp signing in van Michael Richardson
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: pgp signing in van Hector Santos
- Re: pgp signing in van Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: pgp signing in van Måns Nilsson
- RE: pgp signing in van l.wood
- Re: pgp signing in van Anshuman Pratap Chaudhary
- Re: pgp signing in van Måns Nilsson
- Re: pgp signing in van Brian Trammell
- Re: pgp signing in van Andrew Sullivan
- Re: pgp signing in van Cyrus Daboo
- Re: pgp signing in van Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: pgp signing in van Michael Richardson
- Re: pgp signing in van John Levine
- Re: pgp signing in van David Conrad
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: pgp signing in van Richard Barnes
- Re: pgp signing in van Scott Brim
- Re: [IETF] Re: pgp signing in van Warren Kumari
- What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in va… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: pgp signing in van Dan York
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Dave Crocker
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Steve Crocker
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Ted Lemon
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Dave Crocker
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Hector Santos
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Steve Crocker
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… John C Klensin
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Ted Lemon
- Re: pgp signing in van David Morris
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… SM
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Dave Crocker
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Ted Lemon
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Ted Lemon
- Re: not really pgp signing in van John Levine
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… John R. Levine
- Re: pgp signing in van Arturo Servin
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Scott Kitterman
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: not really pgp signing in van John Levine
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… John Levine
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: not really pgp signing in van John R Levine
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: not really pgp signing in van John R Levine
- Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing i… Fernando Gont
- Re: pgp signing in van Fernando Gont
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Brian Trammell
- Re: pgp signing in van t.p.
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Måns Nilsson
- Re: pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- the evil of html was Re: pgp signing in van t.p.
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: pgp signing in van Paul Wouters
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Martin Thomson
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: not really pgp signing in van John R Levine
- Re: not really pgp signing in van manning bill
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Theodore Ts'o
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Ted Lemon
- Re: not really pgp signing in van Yoav Nir
- was: not really pgp signing in van SM
- Re: was: not really pgp signing in van Phillip Hallam-Baker