IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Realistic responses to DMARC

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 18 December 2016 06:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A8B1294DB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 22:04:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=muZMqkbz; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=M5eOtHhL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zyEsEcGtIdM2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 22:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914CA12944A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 22:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 16706 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2016 06:04:20 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=4141.585626e4.k1612; bh=Dmw1BbfWAdJMywWwj6I6/mp/CYSy+yg5PLnNCT+xovY=; b=muZMqkbz2Gur+X1DGb2qpBx2/Qs/yXcfDTNNSNf0bSQf6OY3vUerzMOwlWxEyVVE38Z0LB6xsYZwOHav4W+eE7RkNbfeSv50d7ZKEOL2/Dd4xJMlKa4VMtFLkDef0viPF9KJoe0iv3wvejneo/beBeSCEzultd5VnaMhwW8pGbfweLvDQS/nxEqyZVubhN0hF9mjHRMH5w1pJIiQ0T7yrNOJ0GtljfyL8XxCU3/GNgcIV0a4LC4cgxH+9AxRfHrO
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=4141.585626e4.k1612; bh=Dmw1BbfWAdJMywWwj6I6/mp/CYSy+yg5PLnNCT+xovY=; b=M5eOtHhLw7pN64Pd4sNxwQutXLK9wxaY7akf+iTfG4zlWFul8oWckeKNGKCF9ikv1GwyM0aSfFIdHrK+ExEjy3wQOn4HR4vNrx9uvlPpvLplQNUSCR28hlrblAB8auN73GzWNQks4KEcxKLnAAdRbiiZ+gaap1CgPaXCWkX0azcgbXjzJIPqDiDQz8AlTtiV8s/Q59ezcNLMCZgvQ2lXN5yEZBPWgycEK0LyPvLCKC91NUPKPvMJ4Gc8IwVJewpJ
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 18 Dec 2016 06:04:20 -0000
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 01:04:14 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180101460.14297@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Realistic responses to DMARC
In-Reply-To: <20161218055834.he6gkupqp5xqlvml@thunk.org>
References: <9AD6AAD6812D3B9F8379226B@PSB> <20161218022823.8779.qmail@ary.lan> <20161218055834.he6gkupqp5xqlvml@thunk.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GvvPtQwUlr1DTHkCsgZ1_2YMVV0>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 06:04:18 -0000

> Um, you're assuming that mailing lists serving open source projects
> will either (a) knuckle under to the demands of DMARC, or (b) be
> willing to inflict the pain caused by DMARC-workarounds on their
> users, aren't you?

Yes, those are the only choices at this point.

> I can think of one major open source project (namely, the Linux
> kernel) which has refused to do either.

I'm reasonably sure you're mistaken here.  Don't they rewrite From: 
headers?

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email