Re: Realistic responses to DMARC

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sun, 18 December 2016 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49CC12965A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:34:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.792
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.792 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RO4gNxWDoZpX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E70A12949B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id uBIMZMxo015325 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:35:22 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1482100522; bh=DqUPyc+R9B3oflUODlE2wc/UYcedWOsIVgXHerj5LuA=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=bPpfeDF7CHGj0PTJZgfHxhcx9MHJ1mpj/UA9D1E3LTn8PM/Jgsd6ZaNYnxyP6EeDe dZOIYvMTEySP0Id3cC1RQ5yGOgFp+bpnGimdOvFRMC4PzmMKRAg0W5lpcAERZWPjJr EhlafQTkrHPIq6P7s/pbaQeKLkfpR+lv9Ox6xZgc=
Subject: Re: Realistic responses to DMARC
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <9AD6AAD6812D3B9F8379226B@PSB> <20161218022823.8779.qmail@ary.lan> <20161218055834.he6gkupqp5xqlvml@thunk.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180101460.14297@ary.qy> <20161218065905.5g66jgkvtckydmry@thunk.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180215450.14970@ary.qy> <20161218222427.7phtcg7mhpypcwnb@thunk.org>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <499b8679-37bc-36eb-3ac8-9d99570f42df@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:33:58 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161218222427.7phtcg7mhpypcwnb@thunk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/e7E0NaRxDSt_elayOedTnqlkCUE>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:34:11 -0000

On 12/18/2016 2:24 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>    So when David Crocker tells us that
> the mail providers aren't going to back down, regardless of whether or
> not it is true, *of course* the the mail providers will try to say
> that, because they are trying to intimate people into knuckling under
> and accepting DMARC.

Ted, you are ascribing more concern about this by the providers than I'm 
seeing.

Rather than seeking to invoke some sort of mystical assessment of 
corporate intent, I suggest you do a pragmatic evaluation of actual 
leverage and formulate a practical plan based on it.  Then see who lines 
up in support and follows through with useful action.


> It's all basic power negotiating

Or not.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net