Re: Realistic responses to DMARC
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 16:23 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E1D129722
for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:23:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id YpGa8mgOSLzn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:23:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6B41296D1
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:23:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1482337432;
d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com;
bh=q7yf7txNeH3IOatpnnLZx6MmB2ZScrpM/UvYrDvs/1U=;
h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:
In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Content-ID:Content-Description;
b=T/sBNH/NiRmY+cdCT3lEVQFeCajq3n8SGEqjoWaWsJaztmTyCbTFzgf9Uei09QcJ28VI2h
vwSDo55ZQaNAl4ASJZm+LfId2ArtoLx+SqBncoquw2ZO5koXirMzbINucMrTnIhMWRrMbK
K0UMvNuiofuAecGoD7ds9q+mk2BEJiM=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215])
by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA
id <WFqslwAY12-T@statler.isode.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:23:51 +0000
Subject: Re: Realistic responses to DMARC
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>,
IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <9AD6AAD6812D3B9F8379226B@PSB> <20161218022823.8779.qmail@ary.lan>
<20161218055834.he6gkupqp5xqlvml@thunk.org>
<alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180101460.14297@ary.qy>
<20161218065905.5g66jgkvtckydmry@thunk.org>
<alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180215450.14970@ary.qy>
<20161218222427.7phtcg7mhpypcwnb@thunk.org>
<499b8679-37bc-36eb-3ac8-9d99570f42df@dcrocker.net>
<alpine.OSX.2.11.1612181857510.19758@ary.qy>
<20161219005411.w5tmps5i46lnkydy@thunk.org>
<13804.1482113481@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <e9e9efd0-0d83-63f3-4deb-8e0633cc0d17@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:23:32 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.5.1
In-Reply-To: <13804.1482113481@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------1A130BC601F4BA4578D51E6D"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/poFysI3WOhEoH0cSshcc5KRFZP0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:23:54 -0000
Hi Michael, On 19/12/2016 02:11, Michael Richardson wrote: > BUT, if their email bouncing kicks me off the list, then I will be very > grumpy. My spam filtering provider provides me controls to ignore p=reject > when arriving from certain origins, but this doesn't scale well. I'd rather > the IETF implemented DMARC properly and rejected the email from arriving at > the list. Or the IETF can repudiate DMARC completely. To me, it's the > IESG's choice, but this sitting on the fence for four years pissed me off. On a more serious note: IESG is discussing various options as we speak. I am the lead on this activity. I would ask people to give IESG a bit of time to finish these discussion and don't rehash the DMARC discussion all over again. Best Regards, Alexey
- DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC rel… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Yoav Nir
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Paul Wouters
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Paul Wouters
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… ned+ietf
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Randy Bush
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… S Moonesamy
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Yoav Nir
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Randy Bush
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Ted Lemon
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Ted Lemon
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… S Moonesamy
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John Levine
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John Levine
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John R Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John R Levine
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… S Moonesamy
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Andrew G. Malis
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Dave Crocker
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John R Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John R Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Yoav Nir
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman Hector Santos
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Dave Cridland
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Ted Lemon