Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments
Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> Sun, 30 March 2008 17:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9A828C341; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DdMvrKF8yP2M; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74FA28C21F; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E7F3A677E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2j0vUcomFQRE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yxa.extundo.com (yxa.extundo.com [83.241.177.38]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069C23A6CE3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mocca.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [83.241.177.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa.extundo.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id m2UH4dPA030464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:04:41 +0200
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments
In-Reply-To: <049801c89260$93aa0cd0$6401a8c0@china.huawei.com> (Spencer Dawkins's message of "Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:21:18 -0500")
References: <2B752728-CE81-40B5-8E66-230D5E504D4F@thingmagic.com> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A032BCAC0@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <87r6dtopy9.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <47EE921B.8060509@gmail.com> <877ifkfu86.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <049801c89260$93aa0cd0$6401a8c0@china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)
OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:22:080330:ietf@ietf.org::F0LtCyHAoZBxXdTf:BpXL
X-Hashcash: 1:22:080330:spencer@wonderhamster.org::OJwxSEzdGa5jSJGV:98md
X-Hashcash: 1:22:080330:jmh@joelhalpern.com::VRVXUmsa6/2u+UGK:IMhM
X-Hashcash: 1:22:080330:margaret@thingmagic.com::JHJvM4EpnJNGF0HS:JLlo
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:04:40 +0200
Message-ID: <87k5jkdtxz.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.2, clamav-milter version 0.88.2 on yxa.extundo.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@wonderhamster.org> writes: > Hi, Simon, > >> If the trust uses a software license for code that doesn't meet the >> requirements in, say, the DFSG, would you consider that a failure? If >> that happens, Debian cannot include such code. >> >> Using the NPOSL3.0 as the software license, which I read Ray's message >> to imply was being considered, would be one way to prevent Debian from >> using the code. > > OK so far... > >> I would agree that the references should be for a specific version of >> the documents, if that is your point. > > OK, I unsubscribed to IPR two or three years ago (or maybe it was two or > three PR-actions ago, I can't remember which), so maybe I'm really confused, > but > > - I would disagree with referring to a specific version of these documents, > because tellng the trust "it has to be X-1.0-compatible" will just frustrate > all of us when there's an X-1.1 version, so then we get to have this > conversation all over again - or else, we just trust the trust to do the > right thing (which is what we're discussing now) - or am I misunderstanding? Somewhat; the point of referencing these documents, even if the reference is versioned, is to provide a good sanity test of the license which is needed. If the license doesn't meet these requirements, it won't fulfil what's described in the document already. Yes, these references may be revised and be more refined, but the current one would still be helpful when evaluating potential licenses. > - please, please, please do not try to craft precise guidance on > ietf@ietf.org. We can't even get our own process BCPs right. If there is a > new uber-software license developed thirty minutes after this draft is > published as an RFC, I bet we would want the trust to look seriously at it, > and maybe even do the right thing ("and please ignore our guidance if that > helps you do the right thing"). Sure, this will be a moving target. That's why the document doesn't contain legal text, but just advice on what the legal text should say. > I don't understand how we can have a trust that we can't trust to do the > right thing at some level. The draft is pretty clear about our intentions. My point is that I don't think the draft is clear. There is ample wiggle room and opportunity to go wrong with the current text, and people have gone wrong before in this area. /Simon _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Russ Housley
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Sam Hartman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Olaf Kolkman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Leslie Daigle
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Olaf Kolkman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- RE: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Lawrence Rosen
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Scott O. Bradner
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ray Pelletier
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments SM
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Margaret Wasserman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- RE: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- RE: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Lawrence Rosen
- RE: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments michael.dillon
- -outbound copying rights grant Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Paul Hoffman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Paul Hoffman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Frank Ellermann
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Randy Presuhn
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments David Morris
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Olaf Kolkman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ray Pelletier
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson