Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 28 March 2008 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3756B28C356; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9jdcC44BUdwP; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D86728C2D1; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6413428C2D3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tWs2AnHAW9oF for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dizzyd.com (dizzyd.com [207.210.219.225]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564063A6987 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wrk225.corp.jabber.com (dencfw1.jabber.com [207.182.164.5]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by dizzyd.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D4A240053; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:39:12 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <47ED3B6F.70908@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:39:43 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments
References: <20080324200545.D6E6328C3AE@core3.amsl.com> <87myoji2ut.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20080328111205.0297f728@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20080328111205.0297f728@resistor.net>
Cc: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0494570876=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

SM wrote:
> At 03:01 28-03-2008, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>> To give the Trust something concrete to work with I propose to add the
>> following:
>>
>>   To make sure the granted rights are usable in practice, they need to
>>   at least meet the requirements of the Open Source Definition [OSD],
>>   the Free Software Definition [FSD], and the Debian Free Software
>>   Guidelines [DFSG].
> 
> These are not guidelines; they are requirements.

This is true.

Rather than wrangling over text that might be added to -outbound,
perhaps it would be more productive to describe how members of the
Internet community can provide input to the Trust regarding this issue
(or any other, for that matter). It seems to me that the information at
http://trustee.ietf.org/ does not describe the relevant processes, other
than mentioning <mailto:iad@ietf.org>.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf