IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F99F1296A4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UevjEuQfEm6r for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051B212966D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id o68so62106860qkf.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 08:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=f6Jeb6HJkVZDM9spANAgVxTTGfni655G4SzBH8Hgy/8=; b=x4Z5YPMFcESI6J4Bhy4vtkr9bpHpHYc2IyRV9tr8yDqhW5NgWIcfGZ1OaPIVI7s7Mo E8v2HuN4M8yvEdtLw48Aaj18sl6L8JmzlDiONAJZbnprJ+8wNVlBATXYmE3E070DM2BU ehwcsTMplAcf42vlhYamnqDVhU1r8SZgd6b9Tj0gTnMZ7COftgdZRCeelBY4NBdIu0rL ev1EjqfWaQLpzBlTn38m5/1XWKPU4i17+3BOy/xPPjm8Ad6PaJ0i1sLYV1mggqIjrnWg ZOhKtsu8JTDWavw4W7BHJC0aCfJhMdZpRDNll6p/vG+pY8LX0Kd49lcU78GG1Y/o5Fcq F9Pg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=f6Jeb6HJkVZDM9spANAgVxTTGfni655G4SzBH8Hgy/8=; b=XV5I4b+53EpcypFf8H/HFl6xFjPa3ZEdWUeLK4T0W9rY4AsaA6VpKh3B/2+2SnVkEd +sfZ2WcHjhCgxkoj8xaKw5mL9IGLXVnFc30CIWqLu0cAyxH9xB740/w8PJGLpewdSRXg ZzubtpFwiq3up2v/2P/dsPAWfS3B7K5gYyhaDsDzrcYw0Mpy3hW4VvU80Qr+LPvJ7xoR bxFnQR7skT6VZEtj22vgNI0AZNoY1FxBfJ9atVvDxOudZpqPQ8yBj6kc11U2F3sEVPxB H0VmU49jLyFSf3DLiS4SPK7IX6g734gCr6DhyPTiwORDqVV+sW8mAwJmTntddIpU91Mi 0ZIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd3j3y/ZC5Lg9h95b2XtPP0Zk5WD9Jq0hUDCDf8597tOEAM9Weo5HeaM4j2UO0hSQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.186.70 with SMTP id k67mr9713631qkf.265.1478188129204; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 08:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4d00:abf0:e895:f456:ee6b:7388? ([2601:647:4d00:abf0:e895:f456:ee6b:7388]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b94sm4753959qkb.16.2016.11.03.08.48.47 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Nov 2016 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C001D57A-2A14-4822-92E9-8AD50B754699"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Subject: Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1=Xg+R55SqSrTRrCCT+guF_fUjHm5k16rj9BNxP6RtVaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 08:48:45 -0700
Message-Id: <56A2382D-77C2-4E00-BAD7-D2DD801A4654@gmail.com>
References: <6D5B7C10-C6BE-4D38-9E92-456B4A879B3A@gmail.com> <20161102222552.67679.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1=Xg+R55SqSrTRrCCT+guF_fUjHm5k16rj9BNxP6RtVaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WUfViGE67E3r3hKr5qTSMly8jCg>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:48:51 -0000

Ted,

> What is _not_ okay, and totally not acceptable, is to continue
> allowing things to be broken after three years.

While I agree that it has been broken for a long time and would be good to fix, I note that understanding the problem does not mean there is a workable solution.  From reading this thread, it sounds to me that if there was a workable solution, it would have been fixed by now.  The potential solutions being proposed, appear to have side effect worse than than the original problem.

Good to hear that the IESG is actively discussing the issue.

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email