Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC
Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 19:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F033129893 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tk4h06hR9XWa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C902129B58 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n67so56988212wme.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UE8nBgtuliXxIrtLpTFgHV9AwWqY3moGKHwjOvkpYV4=; b=m3O22RHkEVerag3p3UHPgQAmoAGKBqUjWoZAikqAv7uZqdPBZbIR9D4ZyZw+5dRvrX 291phmpW15HXdmT+zqfFnyV59aN6MSId2vnbMiBg4zBwQj8Z8ak/3YgteOHN+4iuPcv+ fhg4rTUojqMI9bTMxpBH602WqXNW/kGQZ9YYYOP16FdSkstCapbXoOavbgtvro6zdqz5 uPvCsolLngBvGBhSEQLXLKU5N3gJeua0jnA0Rn+RBLC3N7RWTUIL3anH2u91b42ZTx2B W7Hsw202lhDKL54VBKBQMlyZH/ZiVkd3fGCaHRBWWS4BPhSnQ9GVwF2GSyQNAH4YRQ0G Hgjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UE8nBgtuliXxIrtLpTFgHV9AwWqY3moGKHwjOvkpYV4=; b=EoB69qL+VR3PzzfckYQ2o2Cajl6sHsz9wlqE1AsJLknRsat+IM1TeQy3dtcMvR6geD 5tJz0Qbp09zqddoYx8fS99rUX99zvJBegWgv1SQ836lFK5kuu/iyI/tW+EVhoauDlt7B IDpKvKMzLlRqiN4dhNu5JeTaBWlrEhXMVCA1Q51jlR5+k+VFxKIjclnksjiDCj4QDB9C E3Ob1cXc0MMxdEuLb/r9IEmm8URC+0Ss7w6SGpZMyHlR/NEahhx7olsPsZ/P7ZbHEr6J 47ob5qjBJSFUgrOoBxonlbUnFtRbJ30j+fmyXZjNhHSWNvqF2brUe0vKruZH7SRJwNqy CRSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc0VrUztGE2tdjmFZ9nmNWhkCWNArTjkiWiCwct1sEMtHbwobVfnbI8+/WScVyIaw==
X-Received: by 10.194.93.101 with SMTP id ct5mr4155404wjb.11.1478113512589; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jt8sm4363733wjc.33.2016.11.02.12.05.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Subject: Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3244D636-18A7-4F7C-A9F2-E9FA1BD5C1F2@vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:05:09 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6D5B7C10-C6BE-4D38-9E92-456B4A879B3A@gmail.com>
References: <CAPt1N1=_jvrNbhxDyWXpJszUtqRZEEouRibwgWD1aY5wfhsX_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20161102174342.67143.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1=bC96HfVN2s2ZcQjaOtmut2ZTbbKWdGG4mEQT6uOPsGA@mail.gmail.com> <3244D636-18A7-4F7C-A9F2-E9FA1BD5C1F2@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/t79z2euPPcywRaPmB-o_odLlBrA>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:05:33 -0000
> On 2 Nov 2016, at 20:18, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote: > > On 2 Nov 2016, at 10:49, Ted Lemon wrote: > >> I think that really what is going on here is that a very small number >> of people who talk a lot have prevented forward progress fixing an >> issue that significantly affects many IETF participants who aren't >> subscribed to ietf@ because of the noise factor and hence haven't seen >> the discussion. > > That is the opposite impression that I have gotten. It feels to me that what has happened is that the same discussion happens in multiple places with groups that have only some overlap, a person in one group is sure they know the one true solution, and that no one else has thought of it before, so they think that people who say "look at this earlier discussion" are really saying "we don't want to hear from you". > > Before I tuned out of this particular discussion (and I'm not sure why I'm tuning in again now...), I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of "A: we should do X" -> "B: but that would have the side-effect of Y" -> "A: arrgh, you're right. How about Z?" -> "C: that would have this side effect" that went on. It was a wide-ranging, open discussion of tradeoffs. After the third iteration, however, the participants maybe got a bit tired or restating them. > I think pretty much all of these side effects are better than having to go every few days through the spam folder to fish out messages from Jana and Andrei Popov. Last month It made me miss a Gen-Art review during last call. Not a huge deal, but irritating nonetheless. I think it’s time we did something, because it doesn’t look like DMARC is going away or getting any less common. Yoav
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Dave Crocker
- IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- RE: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- RE: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John R Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Paul Hoffman
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Yoav Nir
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brandon Long
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC S Moonesamy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Identification of an email author (was - Re: [dma… Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Terry Zink
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Next step on IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Alexey Melnikov
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Bob Hinden
- RE: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Terry Zink
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Steve Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Options for temporary operational solution to DMA… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Hector Santos
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… John Leslie
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Terry Zink
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Ted Lemon
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… John Levine
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Terry Zink
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Ted Lemon
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Christian Huitema
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Khaled Omar
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… S Moonesamy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… ned+ietf
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… John C Klensin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Brandon Long