Equably when it comes to privacy

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 08 September 2013 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4C711E818F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 00:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ny5lSze3igM7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 00:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C302811E818E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 00:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r887Lo7s029008; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 00:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1378624917; bh=4Wr0HPPp3ObpCK0Xjh7SVYe1EKRmRujrB4reVDz45Lo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=hyABJrX40x9Q0Iv8zDlwtgfkMF/r+6AlUEver6Pe53bxlxz8/xCCR1kBYMG5eHUtB N+ngiE/d/tusI+bsk5LazHahx/Ymo2uUfzJZ/vwbM6vRBvyLk9k/q5W3zNe167DuUA 6lfkX7MPudRCVV0lu1EtSo3b1yn9FeOTIhFnsw1o=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1378624917; i=@resistor.net; bh=4Wr0HPPp3ObpCK0Xjh7SVYe1EKRmRujrB4reVDz45Lo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=XrZAmp0b+nBxR/OynOuR2kprnf/gFpT8t851rWOOZqrhhp+giQviAUWfWJCgTYg4/ /HNyVlTHggl6+IBeOCyls5gxznnopIASPkX6LIhZOQSuPXFMtN5A41+RRV8HbA2gT8 uNFcVGWDICGfnvO9mretHZRS2RiL7yjuFC33zyoY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130907184411.0ba68c30@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 00:21:38 -0700
To: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Equably when it comes to privacy
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1309061604320.1826@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309051743130.47262@hiroshima.bogus.com> <52293197.1060809@gmail.com> <5C7FECAB-8A22-4AF1-B023-456458E1B288@nominum.com> <522949C2.8010206@gmail.com> <52294C6D.7090206@gmail.com> <m2ppsmzgs5.wl%randy@psg.com> <5229686A.5090308@gmail.com> <31078634-5AEA-4FC9-80A8-2E77650BA530@piuha.net> <20130906072539.GJ5700@besserwisser.org> <9AC2A86F-250C-4B3C-B9BA-8DF44C937B41@nominum.com> <20130906210638.GC3428@besserwisser.org> <158C3418-AE87-4843-BFD5-3E2AC3495631@virtualized.org> <CAHBU6itwDc8DiY4B_2GGe0xWZ3Zs_ctx3BkKkzdGTZT2PfgMkA@mail.gmail.com> <D5826CC9-7751-4559-BA3B-AAC38CC9E93C@nominum.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1309061604320.1826@egate.xpasc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 07:22:00 -0000

Hi David,
At 16:10 06-09-2013, David Morris wrote:
>Seriously though, NSA makes a nice villan, but much of our hardware is
>manufactured in counties with fewer restraints than the NSA when it
>comes the right to privacy, etc. Wouldn't suprise me that my major
>brand router has sniffers from more than one country's security agency.

The right to privacy is mentioned in the above.  From 
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-0342&language=EN

   "whereas the US legal system does not ensure the protection of non-US
    citizens, such as EU citizens; whereas, for instance, the protection
    provided by the Fourth Amendment applies only to US citizens and not
    to EU citizens or other non-US citizens;"

There aren't any villains in all this.  There is a question of 
whether the company taking the data will value each of its customers 
equably when it comes to privacy.  It doesn't seem so.

Regards,
-sm