IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [legal] Enough is Enough.

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9623A2B7E; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:45:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KUs_d6G6bGR7; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:45:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7553A2B7D; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:30:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoWNw-1k6Ywc37Eo-00gXJx; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:30:56 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:30:56 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "legal@ietf.org" <legal@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <853846089.14326.1605115856324@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <1910477211.75344.1603228189525@email.ionos.com>
References: <VI1P194MB02851798998F8B7CAE17EBEBAE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <1244503240.69594.1603213781185@email.ionos.com> <VI1P194MB028587C3EBD5F3B842444C24AE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAF4+nEHhpaDUPswSPxNPtsx_daUdo95cADgk9LYDOnnRwnPkUw@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285821C9E9877996F640B04AE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <951477273.71083.1603217515529@email.ionos.com> <VI1P194MB0285037AFE4A08626E5B0336AE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <660145062.71895.1603218804076@email.ionos.com> <VI1P194MB02858A7AA5A66986802CE483AE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <12D64980-5601-4A1D-818E-A7C8E0AA96EF@ietf.org> <957095649.74766.1603226261143@email.ionos.com> <02343FBC-4002-45C4-A739-ADD417E9A2A9@juniper.net> <1910477211.75344.1603228189525@email.ionos.com>
Subject: Re: [legal] Enough is Enough.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cLZA/o+R2lfA36YwmElaDW7CEn4BCwTynrl4fSj8zDMH7UZ3wn9 KzZz/lbKr4LIVSz+Q5hJ8JZVEKq2riBDaYBQ0v/YH5wJsdj/5Q+Why2ftUxql3/Z01BNKHa ylVO7I6YNh/rnzoGTS8NTrb7LH+1l6kbcShODLnHllk49yGje/feUEoKgr3Kt90Llq3hA7k UkXFLsB09S1gIUU5J525g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:f8+JZa1okwI=:RT8KgNxDFxdRooFN5jLrWt rKx//BKySoqqlvDEvu6UpFp5h5emQC6KwHGM7jVo/wSXeoy3jP5XiZtlRpnoxfSYxnDJgceoN TxTKdRmYTSGc0GKE19IEKwsL3IuTf65BayRS0jTI71LCm44+YNAQAPB9IDSbp2PRvA6Uqqvev 18ptlsHUuh8A7YBbmjNy2W/x8ZOu7m2yljSZT+0JqmD/Eg/hP+FPtobnbkZPG70BhMVV/p3v3 /jko4B7ZAT70ixI8Cvchk7Wpb//Q3PuVIhXGjBLfBEY6+aggjZFXBtNV/jGn2lR1u7MUmGSxQ UNKF+/WSLDxt0PuDOqx5L79Ffpi+zFSVcHJ1rWro2zIBDT0zLPJY60CB4dMugDvWJw+/5hZLD qMszXO+kxFUAgZ5AfMUJQkCvCUX2KsXCFwa+FU/X0iBBCle01tKDN02K4Mgr+7MLXYQKCgC0h X0dQLmJDVg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gBL8KRFDVOy0YIHnTylWlwtRp50>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:45:14 -0000

> On 10/20/2020 5:09 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi John,
> I was unable to find the Legend instruction breadcrumbs. 
> 
> Tim 
> 
> > On 10/20/2020 4:58 PM John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Oct 20, 2020, at 4:37 PM, Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote: 
> > 
> > > That was in BCP 78. And section 4 makes that argument moot for Khaled, don't you agree?
> > 
> > 
> > I’m not even an armchair lawyer, but when I look at Section 4, it says "must be marked appropriately asdescribed in the Legend Instructions.” If one follows the trail of breadcrumbs to see exactly what that means, one finds that a different legend is required for "all Alternate Stream Documents (including RFCs and Internet-Drafts)”. It wasn’t used in this instance; rather, the standard IETF stream legend was used.
> > 
> > ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> > 
> > —John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email