IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP

Jan Kundrát <jkt@flaska.net> Thu, 23 February 2012 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jkt@flaska.net>
X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A5921F87FC for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:51:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_CZ=0.445, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AlhWJBYA1ZEz for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:51:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from serv132.fzu.cz (serv132.fzu.cz [147.231.26.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1609E21F87F3 for <imap5@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:51:47 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqIDAOdRRk+T5xpZgWdsb2JhbABEhTStHCIBARYmJ4FzAQEFI1URCxgJFgsCAgkDAgECAUUTCAEBiAasdoooiVEWgxlvBBUCAwECAoUWCQQCAToCBCEXggiBFgSOT4EbhU6SboFb
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.73,470,1325458800"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="4698806"
Received: from freja.fzu.cz ([147.231.26.89]) by serv147.fzu.cz with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2012 15:51:45 +0100
Received: from svist.flaska.net (pc069c.fzu.cz [147.231.27.69]) by freja.fzu.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E54B63DA82 for <imap5@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:51:44 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4F465269.1040901@flaska.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:51:21 +0100
From: Jan Kundrát <jkt@flaska.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120128 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: imap5@ietf.org
References: <3077.1329391344.173214@puncture> <4F3CEB35.9080200@qbik.com> <1329394296.953.140661037317197@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4F3CFD35.10501@qbik.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202161626400.30682@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <4F3D6E57.8010301@qbik.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202171127330.30682@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <4F3F4F8F.3040601@qbik.com> <1329550573.30138.140661038121885@webmail.messagingengine.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202191832430.12769@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20120219192604.GA11323@launde.brong.net> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202201048480.31357@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202201048480.31357@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDC2E6F5898E88A67807DAC0C"
Subject: Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP
X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imap5>
List-Post: <mailto:imap5@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:51:49 -0000

On 02/20/12 11:52, Tony Finch wrote:
> message/rfc822 is also good. IMO every message that is forwarded or
> top-post replied should use message/rfc822 attachments rather than doing
> some fucked up redaction of the original message.

GMail still breaks [1] on such messages -- the web interface shows the
message source and the IMAP server returns invalid BODYSTRUCTURE which
doesn't allow accessing the attached message.

Cheers,
Jan

[1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.general/2637

-- 
Trojita, a fast e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email