IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Fri, 11 December 2015 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D451ACE51 for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:32:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZrLIRonHFbq for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [80.244.248.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E3A1ACE8B for <imapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:32:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AF1FA0089; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:32:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1449826325; bh=hZZP6xvxIpaqIvGHgN0ezxVgmKLZuzrorTGSmjvx5JU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Gvv4NJtVc0t85KUN6PP/I80BcfqqGq/pAPFBGNupkzeYSkiRpWLH2C18k+Tyg689C XGEJedzj92vlv9yl6aKiXUCc72YeNbBywzcjDp4HqASWCxq/L0VZIbcMb4zVN6mMQJ 4MM9GeYzK8pNBZjA/m+68HV58PCcgHXqWKbrJsYQ=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1449826324-14800-14797/11/8; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:32:04 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: imapext@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:32:03 +0000
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.5-9-g8961725; Qt/4.8.6; X11; Linux; Debian GNU/Linux 8.1 (jessie)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <12af288b-e390-4047-bdc2-c65167ff1819@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzwMN4BXVfLX9i+P7Br1fhWV9rzWwauoRFUL9haqvsmzDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJLE_6+vbeB-SeMk1VHDAtq2VvS9yKe9dhQ2LTzr4y=oTg@mail.gmail.com> <DEA84B8F15992B4EA87D5CF3D0EC5F98AE4FCFD8@DRTW-EXMB04.telecom.sna.samsung.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151209223348.0d1a66e0@resistor.net> <CAHC+rVHPmcpLKogQdFrCo+P-GaALoWLLGEw=MeA7hnarQhEYLw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151210080422.10a00dc0@elandnews.com> <5669B439.9010807@isode.com> <CAKHUCzwMN4BXVfLX9i+P7Br1fhWV9rzWwauoRFUL9haqvsmzDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/8c1hFeLQ-PLr-1enNJBBOXJcUdM>
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:32:37 -0000

Dave Cridland writes:
> I feel this is much more confusing than it should be.
>
> If the server gives a pre-auth APPENDLIMIT, but does not give a 
> post-auth APPENDLIMIT, does this mean that there is a general 
> append limit but it does not apply to me, or that there is a 
> general append limit and there's no change for me, or is it an 
> error?

Similar questions apply to the relationship between those two sizes and the 
Submission SIZE.

Arnt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email