Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Fri, 11 December 2015 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29E91ACD80 for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:29:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D5edGiQdtE-f for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:29:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [80.244.248.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD491ACD69 for <imapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:29:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DBBFA0089; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:29:15 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1449822555; bh=1cIuJGhSrz9sJla6MNYfgmX+k8PSK7GIp9ZEBm4vRok=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TrSTeixq0Oh/uUJ0oKxFilgG4bc0TI16LKbgj2SMKfkk2ph9+0pfkPv2tFwEd0gRf 5J9eO8ZOa43qdIuHcS28oRx//kCipmAYAdiSFk8WH3pmAa5n4vhPLkLZihQ9KwCDRD PHEMBB2JDuVeBncVCBeFWYSpB2LleXluf76TXxJM=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1449822554-14800-14797/11/6; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:29:14 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: imapext@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:29:14 +0000
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.5-9-g8961725; Qt/4.8.6; X11; Linux; Debian GNU/Linux 8.1 (jessie)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <b19d51b4-6077-4aeb-bbac-8afd398a99fd@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <B3DA21B0-3076-4D8C-B6C5-73A473BCECAE@qbik.com>
References: <em5ff59120-1b78-4276-a7e3-646027578f07@bodybag> <566A2684.5030109@teamaol.com> <B3DA21B0-3076-4D8C-B6C5-73A473BCECAE@qbik.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/WDBJkYgjNLlWkBzinmAhZqluYUE>
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:29:20 -0000

Adrien de Croy writes:
> Talk to Bill Gates about how his "nobody will ever need more 
> than 640kB RAM" worked out. 

Factually speaking it worked out well; he was right. MS-DOS had various 
constraints, e.g. singletasking, lack of memory protection and the 640k 
limit. The question was whether to raise that limit; 896k would have been 
possible at a cost of some compatibility breaks. Bill said, spread over 
several remarks, "no, let's keep 640k, people are going to upgrade for 
other reasons, not because of the 640k" and in hindsight I think he was 
clearly right.

There's a lesson in that quotation for RFC authors: People are going to 
twist your words around and make you have said stupid things, so watch what 
you write.

Arnt