IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)

Naren <narendrasingh.bisht@gmail.com> Thu, 10 December 2015 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <narendrasingh.bisht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1A21A8BC4; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:15:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0YfskwCnYm_k; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59421A8AE5; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qgea14 with SMTP id a14so153213242qge.0; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:15:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=PUqaD12qOZwj+j+gXu5g2zxM2ZoiJKZr5jKVzsU7fnw=; b=xS9QisnFaUhnGM71HYjs7I9JaoLXoBuzq/07xwFlN7naczLpj+dF+cqccD+3BcFdfi 3fxBRhvzQ001x1M5HQhxhD/Hf2PiAUp5SXt15xhX9fp9gBXhq/QwqOOon3pJypJ3oxh3 d1dUR24XHJ+AfB8dqqMz5GtZ/LKf6m44ycY4NzidzZOLvAX/bLZtrHwE4iZLnagDq3sC 7Wojk8ZzPexxEVHlNaonEmogMmK/JJL/4guZVTAAj7aQhpYdzEwcPjSXkVch8KwrlWkI SFgvRq/he6aQ47W0GoDQL6ZWddeDoDWufhd/r+Z3+8tekA0ByNDfX4IHoH26FA224EzM q45Q==
X-Received: by 10.140.173.65 with SMTP id t62mr8269469qht.96.1449767733418; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:15:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.92.21 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:15:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20151210080422.10a00dc0@elandnews.com>
References: <CALaySJLE_6+vbeB-SeMk1VHDAtq2VvS9yKe9dhQ2LTzr4y=oTg@mail.gmail.com> <DEA84B8F15992B4EA87D5CF3D0EC5F98AE4FCFD8@DRTW-EXMB04.telecom.sna.samsung.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151209223348.0d1a66e0@resistor.net> <CAHC+rVHPmcpLKogQdFrCo+P-GaALoWLLGEw=MeA7hnarQhEYLw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151210080422.10a00dc0@elandnews.com>
From: Naren <narendrasingh.bisht@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:15:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHC+rVEoexsnruY_uAY7t_S4z3PQs6ff8aX7x=48g==98pU4Vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1139b12ec1e35e05268e5a39"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/lbnUtjaxmKCiDIr_xtJJfp4D7X0>
Cc: Narendra Bisht <ns.bisht@sta.samsung.com>, draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, imapext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:15:40 -0000

Hi SM,

We can rephrase that sentence to

"IMAP server MAY advertise this CAPABILITY before or after user has logged
in.The client SHOULD be ready to handle this CAPABILITY irrespective of
user authenticated state"

We do not see any implications in this being advertised before user logged
in.
Can you elaborate more about your concern on this.

Thanks

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:32 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hi Naren,
> At 07:52 10-12-2015, Naren wrote:
>
>> Our MAY means
>> (a) The IMAP server can advertise this capability before the user has
>> logged in.
>> OR
>> (b) The IMAP server can advertise this capability after the user has
>> logged in.
>>
>
> Based on the AD review [1] and the short discussion about that sentence in
> Section 2, my opinion is that the intent of the what is written in the
> draft is not clear.  What are the implications of (a) and (b)?  What if the
> IMAP server advertises that there is a limit which applies to all mailboxes
> before the user has logged in?
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)
>
> 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05633.html
>



-- 
Thanks & Regards
-Narendra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email