IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 16 December 2015 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6661A8991 for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:14:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hnYBkk-La5lV for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:14:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com (mail-ig0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE23F1A898F for <imapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id to4so81988672igc.0 for <imapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:14:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=paRgbWqkqUJuJ9JWrgw7WkojUOPr1ZLyuGKd36PGRME=; b=F4l57jdRzBgnLqISZ7g3l/rh3h9tNQeA+16BE6wpEB01GSON8fpa75JOJr8ofXoqyP PSLDOMWakwpN1c4iVjLEBlF66tdr7I6ofWY2JJdSY+KnVhLkDR96aAgS1KegrzKgfsBf XRmOVjHsCFRYzmZDWzmAn5NyOxKUPANoB0mWpMS5rOOGpJqcNhD5gPnAAaf8Y0VK7871 zoe+T58mf32ESfJEw5IWHXX5CdrWEsCWWpnHeCc+TaKW6fZB72gAyz0rV3t9xItVOdS/ tosbUaQw2XsSLiGwjReNX/NHFU4iN6iYkjCxQiL/lW57xV+0IcVFzdFM0B4Wf0vqE1gP Ir9g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.16.213 with SMTP id 82mr14198665ioq.119.1450296871203; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.181.78 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:14:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1450227514.484496.468602753.3F5C1248@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <CALaySJLE_6+vbeB-SeMk1VHDAtq2VvS9yKe9dhQ2LTzr4y=oTg@mail.gmail.com> <DEA84B8F15992B4EA87D5CF3D0EC5F98AE4FCFD8@DRTW-EXMB04.telecom.sna.samsung.com> <CALaySJK=5nkmF2K0Vt7mgg2honoX9iYS4yhgu+giDjKyDoR0GQ@mail.gmail.com> <32c2862015984affaa4fc7940e55ae43@SEAMBX01.sea.samsung.com> <002a41b079d94bcc9ef9378bed793858@SEAMBX01.sea.samsung.com> <CALaySJKvgm3meQvF-KC4awR30dMSkWT93-JvS6+JuOj-1jRLjw@mail.gmail.com> <1450227514.484496.468602753.3F5C1248@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:14:31 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: mrAfCt1oIoEFLu0bCK39nwJNDmw
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVD641FWp_BpSdjRQJsMsX4-1j3pc3HuttzNj8=37WusnA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/OTegrPjYD9mNblk9hQk24clOcWU>
Cc: "imapext@ietf.org" <imapext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:14:40 -0000

>> Why do we think there's anything wrong with using, say, the word
>> "NONE" (either case-insensitive or case-sensitive; I don't care)?
>> What's wrong with this?:
>>
>> C: t1 STATUS INBOX (APPENDLIMIT)
>> S: * STATUS INBOX (APPENDLIMIT NONE)
>> S: t1 OK STATUS completed
>
> If you're going to do that, why not make it (APPENDLIMIT NIL),
> which already has exactly the meaning that we want?

Yes, I'd forgotten about the existing token "NIL".  I like that approach.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email