IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Fri, 11 December 2015 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953B31ACE4F for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:22:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gx0e_axfxoxu for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com (mail-ob0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850111ACE3C for <imapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obciw8 with SMTP id iw8so79664181obc.1 for <imapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:22:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Tykx4FCo7LhnUwmXEVN5l+JOhNgOkNYsP6dgRU3E/gk=; b=hkIU1bLRh+FcP3v7jVos4w3KkqdeyJR/z2qvrNL6Q9wC/1dWeQ+yRfdZJP9Kaojlaq 6OeI2j4TF4uaL/xBlQ7CvX6UeT+zaYaeWKz3fi6EztkQXSsssglogk+BAo23/kuk/0k3 q+nBkHT974T1z14M4lqVV/J0oKmd/1oGUihh4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Tykx4FCo7LhnUwmXEVN5l+JOhNgOkNYsP6dgRU3E/gk=; b=KVcZzVwzcUlEUFirbjqe9NpxGPOeyYTjKCM7ZbumQRCM18cfaBBrzA8U94U+PRS5xv y6CclS/Vg33eU1I0DaPAszGbpxxnBBCrUf5qldqcjNDyWPoYXUbCU+wueQFoqDNaXcBJ cfF6IAY5bb0jxY0xZ3SsasY43tzAZ8+e3NpLEgFsi+O/WrbTIQ1hz9GE35G3/0GMdZQK pssCwq6e/4fnzFxYiCuqrdnxWqMVcfT9cCUiIZzOypPur2DJze8XLh1m55H/vwRDsNsh 4FJEk2QqgKEIYnxj3mt7fij30uD0rQ9lFsTNXuVdX9MAXfmjTmlwBVzPfK4xQL2ThOqt 29bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlE6bF5/j3OUBH032Jt6yjMmb69XTtcLstti+CrM7Ei+gMwyHUqWc8MLeHemEKsvt4H2USSz22+eou6GWPXn9t7YvOhIQjg/jMA38etiEcC9NYczeI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.97.105 with SMTP id dz9mr13062030oeb.40.1449825723989; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:22:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.11.166 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:22:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzwMN4BXVfLX9i+P7Br1fhWV9rzWwauoRFUL9haqvsmzDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJLE_6+vbeB-SeMk1VHDAtq2VvS9yKe9dhQ2LTzr4y=oTg@mail.gmail.com> <DEA84B8F15992B4EA87D5CF3D0EC5F98AE4FCFD8@DRTW-EXMB04.telecom.sna.samsung.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151209223348.0d1a66e0@resistor.net> <CAHC+rVHPmcpLKogQdFrCo+P-GaALoWLLGEw=MeA7hnarQhEYLw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151210080422.10a00dc0@elandnews.com> <5669B439.9010807@isode.com> <CAKHUCzwMN4BXVfLX9i+P7Br1fhWV9rzWwauoRFUL9haqvsmzDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:22:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzww4rW2GgDSqGfxCn_77AwXbQMu2f4RZN3pgKa-i3hg=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0115eb3043d97305269bdb7b"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/oGtNaXtaoPGftUXdPICyASHDfyg>
Cc: Narendra Bisht <ns.bisht@sta.samsung.com>, Naren <narendrasingh.bisht@gmail.com>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension@ietf.org, "imapext@ietf.org" <imapext@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:22:06 -0000

On 11 December 2015 at 09:20, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:

> If the server gives a pre-auth APPENDLIMIT, but does not give a post-auth
> APPENDLIMIT, does this mean that there is a general append limit but it
> does not apply to me, or that there is a general append limit and there's
> no change for me, or is it an error?
>
>
Also, why would my client care about what append limit other users have?

Dave.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email