IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)

Jayantheesh S B <j.sb@sea.samsung.com> Thu, 10 December 2015 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <j.sb@sea.samsung.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854BC1B2C26; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:39:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q96OJQzfonCV; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wguard02.sdsamerica.net (bware2.sdsamerica.net [206.67.236.192]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0EC1B2C23; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:39:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Jayantheesh S B <j.sb@sea.samsung.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Naren <narendrasingh.bisht@gmail.com>, "imapext@ietf.org" <imapext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)
Thread-Index: AQHRMxe8LOkMw8VRmUSFpR/wpMzQCp7EszeA//+3zCmAAF9IgP//v7kMgAAwydA=
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:39:10 +0000
Message-ID: <9790204f556c42eca3dd39549cf85130@SEAMBX01.sea.samsung.com>
References: <CALaySJLE_6+vbeB-SeMk1VHDAtq2VvS9yKe9dhQ2LTzr4y=oTg@mail.gmail.com> <DEA84B8F15992B4EA87D5CF3D0EC5F98AE4FCFD8@DRTW-EXMB04.telecom.sna.samsung.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151209223348.0d1a66e0@resistor.net> <CAHC+rVHPmcpLKogQdFrCo+P-GaALoWLLGEw=MeA7hnarQhEYLw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151210080422.10a00dc0@elandnews.com> <CAHC+rVEoexsnruY_uAY7t_S4z3PQs6ff8aX7x=48g==98pU4Vg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151210101014.11999820@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20151210101014.11999820@elandnews.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: none
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/HaWK4znxxFwdg6JPl5e2n92KCBY>
Cc: "draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension@ietf.org>, Narendra Bisht <ns.bisht@sea.samsung.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:39:14 -0000

Dear SM,

Please find our response inline. 

Regards,
Jay
-----Original Message-----
From: imapext [mailto:imapext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of S Moonesamy
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 1:24 PM
To: Naren; imapext@ietf.org
Cc: Narendra Bisht; draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension@ietf.org; Barry Leiba
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)

Hi Naren,
At 09:15 10-12-2015, Naren wrote:
>We can rephrase that sentence to
>
>"IMAP server MAY advertise this CAPABILITY before or after user has 
>logged in.The client SHOULD be ready to handle this CAPABILITY 
>irrespective of user authenticated state"
>
>We do not see any implications in this being advertised before user logged in.
>Can you elaborate more about your concern on this.

By implications, I meant:

   (i)  What are the advantages of advertising the upload limit before the user
        has logged in?

[Jay]  One advantage I can think of is.
 A server can have a customized APPENDLIMIT for different users (based on some SLA).
 The server advertises a static APPENDLIMIT before user logs in, to display it support for the extension.
After user logged in then server can show the user specific APPENDLIMIT.

   (ii) What are the disadvantages of advertising the upload limit before the
        user has logged in?

[Jay] I don't see any disadvantage in sending the limit before user logged in. 

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email