Re: [imapext] AD review draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 18 December 2015 11:42 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301A31A923B for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:42:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uc42-u0MerF1 for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07D31A9141 for <imapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:42:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1450438928; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=8I0DrxRWhh2pOJum19WkEgtO3089sVwM/YnpAXnQjKg=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=jr+CExI+hxFX66TsAFmp1OIF7tHGHWWX/sGkJbeHj2AawrfpebV8eef7/MoGkSaZEL80GC s9I3+M4upIFLLEPKavM0dR/8SGeI9IDzs5fAL68vIXQTiB5qVyqLz1Xo4HJJngidZNLIwP AiZtQs8qhBEHb4oIS8ZgTLyRYRq9gA8=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <VnPxDwBBxzd5@statler.isode.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:42:07 +0000
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <emcf7f771e-a84b-4df3-b9ff-06dd5417a655@bodybag> <5A5084CC-6733-45DB-B3D5-4F73285257D0@isode.com> <6679218db47f443794b1ce28452623eb@SEAMBX07.sea.samsung.com> <5672EEDE.5060101@isode.com> <5672F2BE.8060404@teamaol.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151217130638.0d436848@resistor.net> <CAKHUCzwVkC23NEoH9ou2DScdwE=PCYXXonfyW2fbovJHsucEDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <5673F0F3.3080309@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:41:39 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzwVkC23NEoH9ou2DScdwE=PCYXXonfyW2fbovJHsucEDQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060002080505000802040803"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/F9aSzGzMEvrcVvibCz04Fa1QLCw>
Cc: Stu Brandt <stuart.brandt@teamaol.com>, Narendra Bisht <ns.bisht@sea.samsung.com>, "imapext@ietf.org" <imapext@ietf.org>, Jayantheesh S B <j.sb@sea.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:42:10 -0000
On 18/12/2015 10:55, Dave Cridland wrote: > On 17 December 2015 at 21:19, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com > <mailto:sm+ietf@elandsys.com>> wrote: > > Hi Stu, > At 09:37 17-12-2015, Stu Brandt wrote: > > Since RFC 3501 section 4.5 states... > > The special form "NIL" represents the non-existence of a > particular > data item that is represented as a string or parenthesized > list, as > distinct from the empty string "" or the empty > parenthesized list (). > > > ...does the introduction of nil as an alternative to number > now imply that an update to this text is necessary? > > > Thanks for flagging this. > > I don't think so as it is ABNF in > draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension which will be followed. > The following persons are in favor of using "NIL" [1][2][3][4]: > > Barry Leiba (Area Director) > Bron Gondwana > Adrien de Croy > Alexey Melnikov > > I suggest going ahead with that. > > > I'm in favour too, but I'm also in favour of using it in the > CAPABILITY string as well. My reasonings: > > 1) I'd rather minimize the syntactic differences. > > 2) If a server advertises an appendlimit prior to authentication but > wishes to indicate no limit subsequent, there is currently no method > for doing so. I have no clue why a server would wish to do this, but > the specification seems adamant that changing the limit after login > (rather than not advertising it prior) is useful. I think "adamant" is a bit too strong. But I don't object to what you propose.
- [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-append… Barry Leiba
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Barry Leiba
- [imapext] Referencing RFC 2088 (was: AD review of… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] Referencing RFC 2088 Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] Referencing RFC 2088 (was: AD revie… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Narendra Bisht
- Re: [imapext] Referencing RFC 2088 S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] Referencing RFC 2088 (was: AD revie… Naren
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Naren
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Naren
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Barry Leiba
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Stu Brandt
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Stu Brandt
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Dave Cridland
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Dave Cridland
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Barry Leiba
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Barry Leiba
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Narendra Bisht
- Re: [imapext] AD review draft-ietf-imapapnd-appen… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Barry Leiba
- Re: [imapext] AD review draft-ietf-imapapnd-appen… Stu Brandt
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review draft-ietf-imapapnd-appen… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review draft-ietf-imapapnd-appen… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Barry Leiba
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Barry Leiba
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review draft-ietf-imapapnd-appen… Dave Cridland
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review draft-ietf-imapapnd-appen… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-ap… Barry Leiba