IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 10 December 2015 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340F41A8F39; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:20:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqprY8xxd6Qf; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:20:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450D31A8F45; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:20:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1449768018; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=BJcyE/4ljmsRWrn7I29zz688qJhVgdrGXhZTnPstkG8=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=YBdE4wWTx+Zp2oeO3CruiZL4c0ziXNd2VKmXOZVfdpP/jwd33KTOyDqWc1IY0WuuTfO6h8 qw+j4zVKBX5aDJ2zNr+ImLBjfc4bY9opsRy6E0tmbEoCi/hsxle+rH/Y7aHPfw12UOOi8J C64eDJzbJHQDNydL/D3T3OVY5WKqu/8=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <Vmm0UgBBxwog@statler.isode.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:20:18 +0000
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Naren <narendrasingh.bisht@gmail.com>, imapext@ietf.org
References: <CALaySJLE_6+vbeB-SeMk1VHDAtq2VvS9yKe9dhQ2LTzr4y=oTg@mail.gmail.com> <DEA84B8F15992B4EA87D5CF3D0EC5F98AE4FCFD8@DRTW-EXMB04.telecom.sna.samsung.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151209223348.0d1a66e0@resistor.net> <CAHC+rVHPmcpLKogQdFrCo+P-GaALoWLLGEw=MeA7hnarQhEYLw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151210080422.10a00dc0@elandnews.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <5669B439.9010807@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:19:53 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20151210080422.10a00dc0@elandnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/NNUGTrx6nA1HI_6fqzYdTsFMXR4>
Cc: Narendra Bisht <ns.bisht@sta.samsung.com>, draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:20:21 -0000

On 10/12/2015 16:32, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Naren,
> At 07:52 10-12-2015, Naren wrote:
>> Our MAY means
>> (a) The IMAP server can advertise this capability before the user has 
>> logged in.
>> OR
>> (b) The IMAP server can advertise this capability after the user has 
>> logged in.
>
> Based on the AD review [1] and the short discussion about that 
> sentence in Section 2, my opinion is that the intent of the what is 
> written in the draft is not clear.  What are the implications of (a) 
> and (b)?  What if the IMAP server advertises that there is a limit 
> which applies to all mailboxes before the user has logged in?
The it means that the limit applies to all users. However the server can 
also return another limit for some users after logging in, which will 
override the globally announced limit. So it is not OR, but AND/OR.
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)
>
> 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05633.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email