IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06

Jayantheesh S B <j.sb@sea.samsung.com> Thu, 17 December 2015 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <j.sb@sea.samsung.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D0D1B3085 for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:31:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_36=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0z4v43kMFEH9 for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wguard02.sdsamerica.net (bware2.sdsamerica.net [206.67.236.192]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585C91A8982 for <imapext@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:31:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Jayantheesh S B <j.sb@sea.samsung.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Narendra Bisht <ns.bisht@sea.samsung.com>
Thread-Topic: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06
Thread-Index: AQHRMRx9gijbZuD2bkC3YmuL4+ER+J7DNZQAgAG44QD//9fycIAHkvBQgAB60gCAAFc2AIABQviAgAB8MgCAAG7TgIAAcV0AgAAI0AD//90ScA==
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:31:06 +0000
Message-ID: <0d5eee161a1e4e2ab78ea4696e6fa17e@SEAMBX01.sea.samsung.com>
References: <emcf7f771e-a84b-4df3-b9ff-06dd5417a655@bodybag> <5A5084CC-6733-45DB-B3D5-4F73285257D0@isode.com> <6679218db47f443794b1ce28452623eb@SEAMBX07.sea.samsung.com> <CAC4RtVDnirH1n1hjtLPpMAEYgBmdYmsQxo3WiXiErEFQYPP8gg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDnirH1n1hjtLPpMAEYgBmdYmsQxo3WiXiErEFQYPP8gg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_003_0d5eee161a1e4e2ab78ea4696e6fa17eSEAMBX01seasamsungcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: none
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/EBZkwO9Ec-wGD9_6zVi1MpEOW6E>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "S Moonesamy (sm+ietf@elandnews.com)" <sm+ietf@elandnews.com>, "S Moonesamy (sm+ietf@elandsys.com)" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "imapext@ietf.org" <imapext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:31:13 -0000

Hi Barry,

Please find the latest version of the draft (version 07) attached. As per the review discussion, we have updated the draft.

We have attached XML and Text version of the draft. Kindly go through the same and share your comments.

We will upload the draft once if all the review comments has been addressed.

Regards,
Jay
-----Original Message-----
From: imapext [mailto:imapext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 12:33 PM
To: Narendra Bisht
Cc: Alexey Melnikov; imapext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06

> The data type for APPENDLIMIT is NUMBER.

I don't understand that statement: there are no "data types" in IMAP commands.  There's ABNF.

> Will it accommodate a NIL?

It will if you change the ABNF like this:

OLD
appendlimit-respcode = "APPENDLIMIT" SP number

NEW
appendlimit-respcode = "APPENDLIMIT" SP (number / "NIL")

END

...and you'd add text explaining that if there is no limit for a particular mailbox, the STATUS APPENDLIMIT response for that mailbox is NIL.

There's no need to allow NIL in appendlimit-cap, because if there's no limit you just don't send that item at all.

Barry

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email