IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> Fri, 31 March 2017 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D01E12995D for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.146
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N8jtpvg2Muvh for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092066018.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.66.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A4F512987B for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=SpNfmq4bjGTrhhoAQwTcnsvh7pyZ/LVkEs6hR2EgFmM=; b=XfUxz0deIUg3XdzC2Le8UjqtgEJErozTXiLRAMl2llbDBnj0XgBFgrzKemrL6Q+gdhGIvuO+2VUohQyn1eHneLSl9KdSQqipB3BTHtVYhXCns3Zr0IuD2JPkoKL+wVTVZZd8EHdf6Xg2yYQtV14VIwEImTuuWhngxTTrkfGDtU8ug22EZtubjLBLDOV7ymYoljj8l5sbkpJnOffN0jJ0nis9ry7dRf3WyeyQACHep6qHPNMH0227dF50UaAm15q1NdqkZ3hhBaJWF21h/JlOKunuA+TGiZlYglzXKmdL77P+rppDDg4mVv6qVbniBgeQ9XatLcgRrvRYYSYkVOYFEg==
Received: from HE1EUR01FT052.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.53) by HE1EUR01HT197.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.1.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.977.7; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:39:47 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.0.58) by HE1EUR01FT052.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.1.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1005.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:39:47 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.44.150]) by AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.44.150]) with mapi id 15.01.0991.023; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:39:47 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
CC: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
Thread-Index: AQHSqfSos1f70z39pEiy56Z0WIwUU6Gu1o4QgAAsQoCAAAJDAA==
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:39:47 +0000
Message-ID: <AM4PR0401MB2241EB7840B768346F004C26BD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <D502B93A.74992%lee@asgard.org> <AM4PR0401MB224189BDD22CD327CF280AA3BD340@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703310806130.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <1d67d033-8a0f-c7eb-ae37-ec99f5a34660@kit.edu> <AM4PR0401MB2241FCE296DCD88D7D065520BD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703311627530.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703311627530.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: swm.pp.se; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;swm.pp.se; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:35E87D48518249383732B947F5085E56F5F76E75FB5C39AB8B66E0E0E558D2D5; UpperCasedChecksum:439444326BE7489DE62A6690B7285BBA012FA471C8269C2DE2D452534997EB97; SizeAsReceived:8436; Count:42
x-tmn: [oou7pCjLvOE0Q5FKehCRdZSFGzY7xjrg]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1EUR01HT197; 5:ZnPBW+jrmFSeFZDZfTTvSpJ1WpoaoDX5dIjRk8WwyUbwAYYetSDE2UHoNlnDyz+xef35arY9izU9//clGrZ/L6LAUO38ZC1DkhI7qUrd2UhhHM76gjT79DFmvF827oA8w6J1WU+bmufALsGmgPBaCg==; 24:su4iem1fKQbGZ2Nh+G1epsRN7KtDiMIGwkW4NO/0r/MgGraoKzot5h4s+S6TWqezKkdNRpc6mq03XhNfNTP0XH23di5/EfQ1IFviaW1THfs=; 7:HIiDtbxHXjbSDA2wQI+nGExiG5a6cvOXX1mXBxtaxM3ZXr83r9sefoyAonR21J2cu5a02YtaqpnfspCVT0sbsdQF2TVwyhbJ0QsUGJ401LJ+jqkHT3kLapcTy1Q9J63GPysENecD23p55GT+SJBhhsAHrXdXKdtLiBVu9aG2Vrrzxz2houlteyXcPpLViBDWytf8NA+HGSF1gcSkGTyFLXypD4Wf77MeM7qVSMZG6mcFL/LKxkbmd5WN3ZfOfRl5kbXJWhAfCZVfO0bYBmAUW2NijwJQoG7i2CSxXc5b5AH/7EkrL9FPQ82dYSrYTfke
x-incomingheadercount: 42
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1EUR01HT197; H:AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 70c84135-412a-43e0-5608-08d47843c7d6
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322274)(1603101448)(1601125374)(1701031045); SRVR:HE1EUR01HT197;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:HE1EUR01HT197; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1EUR01HT197;
x-forefront-prvs: 02638D901B
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Mar 2017 14:39:47.4565 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR01HT197
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/mx43q-A7f-II1TRhGnYHKYY-Ros>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:39:54 -0000

> Because your ideas could possibly have been included in IPv6 and we would have had support for it by now. Now you're 20 years too late, and your energy would be better spent trying to make IPv6 more deployable without changing the on-wire packet format.

How you would know 20 years ago that IPv6 will not be deployed in a short time so you wanted to add IPv10 to IPv6 ?!

Regarding the energy spent trying to make IPv6 more deployable, I think you can ask the RIRs for the trainings they have made worldwide to make the migration to IPv6 occurs.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swmike@swm.pp.se] 
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 4:31 PM
To: Khaled Omar
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Khaled Omar wrote:

>> As has been stated again and again. Your proposal would have been interesting if it was presented in 1995, or perhaps even in 2000.
>
> FYI, IPv10 will allow IPv4 to communicate to IPv6 and vice versa, how can it be interesting if it was presented before IPv6 was even developed !

Because your ideas could possibly have been included in IPv6 and we would have had support for it by now. Now you're 20 years too late, and your energy would be better spent trying to make IPv6 more deployable without changing the on-wire packet format.

You're grossly underestimating the effort and time to get devices into the field to properly support a new packet format.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email