IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> Sat, 01 April 2017 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1921129434 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.146
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vzsfrHwkAMer for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092070038.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.70.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2CF0129663 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=tP4edDFhlXcqNU7QDrJ0Yd22Z3xRQP0QO6ZOZwhRcnY=; b=VkK6TK0OHQ5hxv87W+3tEiHNF4oQ7+VFKfhQDtqlRT0deYM7crGtl1DZOAEH0vkCidhu9motq9v54m4k85ay6rPsp5RPwg/zrQbASmDvSne8RKnJuzdaW8fqIxsQGulLtvWC7jc0Qy4cJT1ruhm3QXhNBB+tMlH49leoU4yGUe/B8YFi3b3jrhthv6TnjI4Wx4xA7vAOQ/JHetOsK94GE0wp+Kcdp75GaDGSvvPkQzd73OebRb0y1LG/RR+VpPDiAMRWZO5n/XLjvbc5UUKypmrknz2lH5NCjLNi3BxU83DUJepkHv4+xQfGdaJpD44oSSP4/9sGjF2YfkWaIB/X6w==
Received: from DB5EUR03FT039.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.20.58) by DB5EUR03HT065.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.21.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1005.5; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 18:45:33 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.20.59) by DB5EUR03FT039.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.21.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1005.5 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 18:45:33 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bd5b:1ace:ba8d:6166]) by AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bd5b:1ace:ba8d:6166%19]) with mapi id 15.01.1005.016; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 18:45:33 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
Thread-Index: AQHSqfSos1f70z39pEiy56Z0WIwUUw==
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:45:33 +0000
Message-ID: <AM4PR0401MB2241C4455ABDD9FF620EDBC5BD360@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <E01FBA67-D178-45B1-B203-2E5A8778CA9D@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:2DEDAA87BB72DF142E5B8D63E1AFEA978E61B3D2222F768F18143857E16795B1; UpperCasedChecksum:76E36BD14041C3B2DDA12FD7C7C8BD637A3CB2E7BD4A56BA609AD54FC65402BA; SizeAsReceived:7928; Count:38
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5EUR03HT065; 5:H5NcrriaJgfZrophJ+vr7kJNS2GmSAvhQ4vuuF44TGOdmssC9+yeTDrQPpXUTf6crRu6pMGLOMG9pUiva5sWWvqtJ/eXAnroduMteQZyFMZviGB++A678mfIsm0n4oSm7QyuOl3h8RZohjEGgQEq7w==; 24:fiYeWRzSZnGxrCr8lVLQvTsy+F2uPBJZw5xque1N20hpH0bVRieMXvEQTYOk6LB0nbLBBUouKKLMH3b0TAt11ICGWJJjz6V+S8YpkhmhBnk=; 7:NOn3kDi6JjZS84iRCY8r4PZxG8/AavSymGQSl/pq/J535yR4HSnfI9RY+gRZ3Y2vZvnE52zGnLlwOlf/zOvBMxLoHbumT6gkDL1czNrrv/ZewCG/kEOSdCG4C98LeHq5Zi/pJdw9Q6KYzGRwiYoqHtYBlsQ72S6ac2oERTLgmaF6hIkPl4Wi6Dbh7llZ9vUNrBkvosHyLDSVBizLP28viyqE7Goa9rzVXZ39dhJ8O2UHToaPHtLa8sYMceTEQicBVu2uc/Ix06/PjccTC73FYvwbx5OIainb+qTQ02PC2Y+S7U4cV8eH4TaQO3BsR8bx
x-incomingheadercount: 38
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5EUR03HT065; H:AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a87f18df-3848-4727-4fab-08d4792f4698
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322274)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:DB5EUR03HT065;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:DB5EUR03HT065; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5EUR03HT065;
x-forefront-prvs: 0264FEA5C3
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM4PR0401MB2241C4455ABDD9FF620EDBC5BD360AM4PR0401MB2241_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Apr 2017 18:45:33.2423 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR03HT065
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/nXngdrDHh1riZGrGjwdt8PMujr8>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:45:39 -0000

Steqart,

IPv10 is a software update modification (by technology companies), IPv6 migration process requires planning, implementation, configuration, support, etc (by enterprise customers and ISPs), very big difference.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
From: Stewart Bryant
To: Khaled Omar
CC: joel jaeggli ,int-area@ietf.org




On 1 Apr 2017, at 6:12 am, Khaled Omar wrote:

>>
>
> That's why all Internet hosts must be IPv10 hosts.

If all hosts can be made IPv10, they can all be made IPv6. Thereby reducing this to a previously solved problem.

... or should I have looked more closely at the posting date?

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email